Electric flux density of oscillating electric charge

In summary, the electric flux density in free space produced by an oscillating electric charge can be given by the equation \vec{D}=\hat{r}\frac{10^{-9}}{4\pi r^2}cos(wt-\beta r), where \beta=w \sqrt{\mu_0 \epsilon_0}. To find the time-average charge that produces this electric flux density, the equation div\vec{D}=\rho (1) can be used, where \rho is the charge density. However, it is important to note that the charge density is not uniform and is dependent on r, so the volume integral \iiint_V \rho \ dV must be evaluated to find the actual charge.
  • #1
Fernando Valadares
5
3

Homework Statement



The electric flux density in free space produced by an oscillating electric charge placed at the origin is given by
[tex]\vec{D}=\hat{r}\frac{10^{-9}}{4\pi r^2}cos(wt-\beta r), \ \ where \ \beta=w \sqrt{\mu_0 \epsilon_0}[/tex]
Find the time-average charge that produces this electric flux density

Homework Equations


[tex]div\vec{D}=\rho \ (1) \\ \int_S \vec{D}.\vec{ds}=Q_{int} \ (2)[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


This is the exercise 1.9 from Balanis' Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics. As the charge is oscillating, we can see a propagation delay in the cosine argument. Applying the divergent in D in spherical coordinates, we get the value
[tex]div\vec{D}=\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}(r^2 cos(wt-\beta r)\frac{10^{-9}}{4\pi r^2}) = \beta sin(wt-\beta r)\frac{10^{-9}}{4\pi r^2}[/tex]
And that is the value of the charge density. As expected, it goes to infinity when r→0, but it isn't zero when r≠0. In the other hand, equation (2) gives the value of internal charge Qint=10-9cos(wt-βr), as expected from a oscillating punctual charge. Why equation (1) gives a wrong value?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hello @Fernando Valadares,

Welcome to PF! :welcome:

Fernando Valadares said:

Homework Statement



The electric flux density in free space produced by an oscillating electric charge placed at the origin is given by
[tex]\vec{D}=\hat{r}\frac{10^{-9}}{4\pi r^2}cos(wt-\beta r), \ \ where \ \beta=w \sqrt{\mu_0 \epsilon_0}[/tex]
Find the time-average charge that produces this electric flux density

Homework Equations


[tex]div\vec{D}=\rho \ (1) \\ \int_S \vec{D}.\vec{ds}=Q_{int} \ (2)[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


This is the exercise 1.9 from Balanis' Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics. As the charge is oscillating, we can see a propagation delay in the cosine argument. Applying the divergent in D in spherical coordinates, we get the value
[tex]div\vec{D}=\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}(r^2 cos(wt-\beta r)\frac{10^{-9}}{4\pi r^2}) = \beta sin(wt-\beta r)\frac{10^{-9}}{4\pi r^2}[/tex]

I think you missed a minus sign in there. :wink: Other than that, it looks good to me so far.

[Edit: Ooops. That minus sign was my mistake, not yours. :oops: Sorry about that. Your answer looks good as it is. :smile:]

And that is the value of the charge density. As expected, it goes to infinity when r→0, but it isn't zero when r≠0. In the other hand, equation (2) gives the value of internal charge Qint=10-9cos(wt-βr), as expected from a oscillating punctual charge.

That also looks good to me. :smile:

Why equation (1) gives a wrong value?

Besides the absence of the minus sign in your first answer, they both look correct to me.

Perhaps you are confusing charge density with the charge itself.

In order to determine the charge from the charge density, you must integrate the charge density over the volume. You cannot simply multiply times the volume of the Guassian surface in this case because the charge density is not uniform (it is dependent upon r).

You really need to do the integration when doing this approach.

[tex] Q_{int} = \iiint_V \rho \ dV [/tex]

where [itex] dV [/itex] is the volume element and, depending on the variables you use for your spherical coordinate system, will be of the form:
[itex] dV = r^2 \sin \theta \ dr \ d \theta \ d \phi [/itex]
(I don't have Balanis' Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics, so I don't know what conventions the book uses. I'm just saying the volume element will look something like above, although it might use different variables or have variables swapped around. You should use what your book uses.)

So first, fix that negative sign in charge density, [itex] \rho [/itex].

Second, [well, first actually] evaluate that volume integral of the charge density and it should match your second answer. Good luck! :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Fernando Valadares

1. What is electric flux density?

Electric flux density, also known as electric displacement, is a measure of the electric field passing through a given area. It is defined as the amount of electric flux per unit area.

2. How does electric flux density relate to oscillating electric charge?

When an electric charge oscillates, it creates a changing electric field that leads to the generation of an electric flux. This flux is directly proportional to the electric flux density, which means that as the charge oscillates, so does the electric flux density.

3. What is the formula for calculating electric flux density for an oscillating electric charge?

The formula for electric flux density due to an oscillating electric charge is D = Q/4πr^2, where D is the electric flux density, Q is the electric charge, and r is the distance from the charge.

4. How does the distance from the oscillating electric charge affect the electric flux density?

The electric flux density is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the oscillating electric charge. This means that as the distance increases, the electric flux density decreases.

5. Why is understanding the electric flux density of oscillating electric charge important?

Understanding the electric flux density of oscillating electric charge is important in many areas of science and technology, such as electromagnetism and circuit design. It helps us understand how electric charges behave and how they interact with each other, leading to the development of new technologies and applications.

Similar threads

  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
566
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
157
Replies
1
Views
755
Replies
4
Views
447
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
905
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
162
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
430
Back
Top