Integrals to Solve Area and Center of Mass of a Cut Circle

In summary, the problem involves finding the centroid of the remaining hatched area when a circle is cut by a line. The equation of the circle is written in polar coordinates and the equation of the line is in Cartesian coordinates. The mass of a lamina is defined and the center of mass is calculated using moments. The next step is to use the same coordinate system and solve for the bounds of the integrals. However, it may be easier to integrate with respect to y instead of x.
  • #1
engg05
3
0

Homework Statement


I am after finding the centroid of the remaining area (hatched) when a circle is cut by a line. I made a diagram in CAD that demonstrates the problem.

lw8F3pr.jpg


The idea is that, starting from the bottom of the circle, a cut is taken leaving a remaining shape whose area and centroid can be calculated. [itex]dc[/itex] denotes the height from the bottom of the circle to the center of mass and [itex]c[/itex] is the height from the bottom of the circle where the cut line is.

I believe the problem I am having is to do with the equation of the circle being written in polar coordinates and the equation of the line is in cartesian coordinates.

Homework Equations


The mass of a lamina is per the following definition:

[tex]M = ρ\int_{a}^{b} f(x)-g(x) dx[/tex]

Where I am taking:
$$f(x) = \sqrt{r^2-x^2}$$ and,
$$g(x) = c$$

I am ignoring the density [itex]ρ[/itex] in the mass equation above because it will cancel out when I divide using moments to solve for the center of mass:

[tex]M_x = ρ\int_{a}^{b} \frac{1}{2}([f(x)]^2-[g(x)]^2) dx[/tex]

Thus the center of mass of a lamina is:

[tex]\bar{x}=\frac{M_x}{M}=\frac{\int_{a}^{b} \frac{1}{2}([f(x)]^2-[g(x)]^2) dx}{\int_{a}^{b} f(x)-g(x) dx}=\frac{1}{A}\int_{a}^{b} \frac{1}{2}([f(x)]^2-[g(x)]^2) dx[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


My first step is to use the same coordinate system for both the line at distance [itex]c[/itex] and the circle.

The equation of the circle is thus:
[tex](x-h)^2+(y-k)^2=r^2[/tex]
rewritten in terms of y:
[tex]f(x) = \sqrt{r^2-(x-h)^2}+k[/tex]
Where [itex](h,k)[/itex] represents in the cartesian [itex](x,y)[/itex] coordinates that define the center of the circle. Now is makes more sense that I also use:
[tex]g(x) = c[/tex]
Next step is solving for the bounds on the above intergrals [itex]a,b[/itex].
[tex]x = \sqrt{r^2-(c-k)^2}+h[/tex]
Thus:
[tex] b = +\sqrt{r^2-(c-k)^2}+h[/tex]
[tex] a = -\sqrt{r^2-(c-k)^2}+h[/tex]

Mass integral with constant density:
[tex]M = ρ\int_{-\sqrt{r^2-(c-k)^2}+h}^{+\sqrt{r^2-(c-k)^2}+h} (\sqrt{r^2-(x-h)^2}+k-c) dx[/tex]
I want to hold here for some further advice because the resulting expression is quite large. Does anyone have any comments on my working so far? Is there an easier approach? Perhaps remaining in polar coordinates?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The way you've set your integrals up, you're omitting the left and right ends of the circle. I suggest you integrate with respect to ##y##.

I'm not sure how you got ##M_x = \frac \rho 2 \int (f^2-g^2)\,dx##.
 
  • #3
engg05 said:

Homework Statement


I am after finding the centroid of the remaining area (hatched) when a circle is cut by a line. I made a diagram in CAD that demonstrates the problem.

lw8F3pr.jpg


The idea is that, starting from the bottom of the circle, a cut is taken leaving a remaining shape whose area and centroid can be calculated. [itex]dc[/itex] denotes the height from the bottom of the circle to the center of mass and [itex]c[/itex] is the height from the bottom of the circle where the cut line is.

I believe the problem I am having is to do with the equation of the circle being written in polar coordinates and the equation of the line is in cartesian coordinates.

Homework Equations


The mass of a lamina is per the following definition:

[tex]M = ρ\int_{a}^{b} f(x)-g(x) dx[/tex]

Where I am taking:
$$f(x) = \sqrt{r^2-x^2}$$ and,
$$g(x) = c$$

I am ignoring the density [itex]ρ[/itex] in the mass equation above because it will cancel out when I divide using moments to solve for the center of mass:

[tex]M_x = ρ\int_{a}^{b} \frac{1}{2}([f(x)]^2-[g(x)]^2) dx[/tex]

Thus the center of mass of a lamina is:

[tex]\bar{x}=\frac{M_x}{M}=\frac{\int_{a}^{b} \frac{1}{2}([f(x)]^2-[g(x)]^2) dx}{\int_{a}^{b} f(x)-g(x) dx}=\frac{1}{A}\int_{a}^{b} \frac{1}{2}([f(x)]^2-[g(x)]^2) dx[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


My first step is to use the same coordinate system for both the line at distance [itex]c[/itex] and the circle.

The equation of the circle is thus:
[tex](x-h)^2+(y-k)^2=r^2[/tex]
rewritten in terms of y:
[tex]f(x) = \sqrt{r^2-(x-h)^2}+k[/tex]
Where [itex](h,k)[/itex] represents in the cartesian [itex](x,y)[/itex] coordinates that define the center of the circle. Now is makes more sense that I also use:
[tex]g(x) = c[/tex]
Next step is solving for the bounds on the above intergrals [itex]a,b[/itex].
[tex]x = \sqrt{r^2-(c-k)^2}+h[/tex]
Thus:
[tex] b = +\sqrt{r^2-(c-k)^2}+h[/tex]
[tex] a = -\sqrt{r^2-(c-k)^2}+h[/tex]

Mass integral with constant density:
[tex]M = ρ\int_{-\sqrt{r^2-(c-k)^2}+h}^{+\sqrt{r^2-(c-k)^2}+h} (\sqrt{r^2-(x-h)^2}+k-c) dx[/tex]
I want to hold here for some further advice because the resulting expression is quite large. Does anyone have any comments on my working so far? Is there an easier approach? Perhaps remaining in polar coordinates?

(1) Polar coordinates are the worst way to go.
(2) Why do you choose to integrate with respect to x? Since you have a 2D region, you could equally well integrate with respect to y.
 
  • #4
engg05 said:

Homework Statement


I am after finding the centroid of the remaining area (hatched) when a circle is cut by a line. I made a diagram in CAD that demonstrates the problem.

lw8F3pr.jpg


The idea is that, starting from the bottom of the circle, a cut is taken leaving a remaining shape whose area and centroid can be calculated. [itex]dc[/itex] denotes the height from the bottom of the circle to the center of mass and [itex]c[/itex] is the height from the bottom of the circle where the cut line is.

I believe the problem I am having is to do with the equation of the circle being written in polar coordinates and the equation of the line is in cartesian coordinates.

Homework Equations


The mass of a lamina is per the following definition:

[tex]M = ρ\int_{a}^{b} f(x)-g(x) dx[/tex]

Where I am taking:
$$f(x) = \sqrt{r^2-x^2}$$ and,
$$g(x) = c$$

I am ignoring the density [itex]ρ[/itex] in the mass equation above because it will cancel out when I divide using moments to solve for the center of mass:

[tex]M_x = ρ\int_{a}^{b} \frac{1}{2}([f(x)]^2-[g(x)]^2) dx[/tex]

Thus the center of mass of a lamina is:

[tex]\bar{x}=\frac{M_x}{M}=\frac{\int_{a}^{b} \frac{1}{2}([f(x)]^2-[g(x)]^2) dx}{\int_{a}^{b} f(x)-g(x) dx}=\frac{1}{A}\int_{a}^{b} \frac{1}{2}([f(x)]^2-[g(x)]^2) dx[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


My first step is to use the same coordinate system for both the line at distance [itex]c[/itex] and the circle.

The equation of the circle is thus:
[tex](x-h)^2+(y-k)^2=r^2[/tex]
rewritten in terms of y:
[tex]f(x) = \sqrt{r^2-(x-h)^2}+k[/tex]
Where [itex](h,k)[/itex] represents in the cartesian [itex](x,y)[/itex] coordinates that define the center of the circle. Now is makes more sense that I also use:
[tex]g(x) = c[/tex]
Next step is solving for the bounds on the above intergrals [itex]a,b[/itex].
[tex]x = \sqrt{r^2-(c-k)^2}+h[/tex]
Thus:
[tex] b = +\sqrt{r^2-(c-k)^2}+h[/tex]
[tex] a = -\sqrt{r^2-(c-k)^2}+h[/tex]

Mass integral with constant density:
[tex]M = ρ\int_{-\sqrt{r^2-(c-k)^2}+h}^{+\sqrt{r^2-(c-k)^2}+h} (\sqrt{r^2-(x-h)^2}+k-c) dx[/tex]
I want to hold here for some further advice because the resulting expression is quite large. Does anyone have any comments on my working so far? Is there an easier approach? Perhaps remaining in polar coordinates?

Instead of frying your brain trying to write integrals to calculate the area and moment of the shaded part, why not try calculating the area and moment of the circular segment which is not shaded? You can write a couple of integral expressions for the area and moment of this segment which are much simpler than trying to do it for the rest of the circle. You can always subtract the area and moment of the segment from the whole circle, and then find an expression for locating the centroid of the shaded area using algebra.

You should also take advantage of symmetry to simplify calculations as well. Look at this figure:


706-quarter-circle-differential-strip.gif


By using the setup from the figure above, you can write a couple of integral expressions for the area and moment of the segment and evaluate them without having to lobotomize yourself in the process.
 
  • #5
Thank you all for your input.

SteamKing - your approach was great thank you for your help.

Final solution:

[tex]C_y = \frac{\pi r^3-\frac{r^2\left(r+\frac{4rsin^3(\frac{\theta}{2})}{3(\theta-sin\theta)}\right)\left(\theta-sin\theta\right)}{2}}{\pi r^2-\frac{r^2\left(\theta-sin\theta\right)}{2}}[/tex]

Fairly certain this only works between 0 and r which is precisely what I was after.

Thanks again.
 
  • #6
engg05 said:
Thank you all for your input.

SteamKing - your approach was great thank you for your help.

Final solution:

[tex]C_y = \frac{\pi r^3-\frac{r^2\left(r+\frac{4rsin^3(\frac{\theta}{2})}{3(\theta-sin\theta)}\right)\left(\theta-sin\theta\right)}{2}}{\pi r^2-\frac{r^2\left(\theta-sin\theta\right)}{2}}[/tex]

Fairly certain this only works between 0 and r which is precisely what I was after.

Thanks again.
You should check your results against these values for the centroid:

http://www.efunda.com/math/areas/circularsegment.cfm

If you set θ = π radians in your expression for Cy, you should get ##C_y=r+\frac{4r}{3π}##, which is the centroid of a semi-circle, measured as indicated by the distance dc in the diagram in the OP.
 
  • #7
engg05 said:
Thank you all for your input.

SteamKing - your approach was great thank you for your help.

Final solution:

[tex]C_y = \frac{\pi r^3-\frac{r^2\left(r+\frac{4rsin^3(\frac{\theta}{2})}{3(\theta-sin\theta)}\right)\left(\theta-sin\theta\right)}{2}}{\pi r^2-\frac{r^2\left(\theta-sin\theta\right)}{2}}[/tex]

Fairly certain this only works between 0 and r which is precisely what I was after.

Thanks again.

Alternately, if you had integrated wrt y instead of x you would have gotten ##\text{Area} = A = \int_{-(r-c)}^r 2 \sqrt{r^2 - y^2} \, dy ##
and the y-component of the centroid involves the integral ##\int_{-(r-c)}^r 2 y \sqrt{r^2 - y^2} \, dy##, which is particularly elementary. (Of course, the x-component of the centroid is zero, by symmetry.)
 
  • #8
Ray Vickson said:
Alternately, if you had integrated wrt y instead of x you would have gotten ##\text{Area} = A = \int_{-(r-c)}^r 2 \sqrt{r^2 - y^2} \, dy ##
and the y-component of the centroid involves the integral ##\int_{-(r-c)}^r 2 y \sqrt{r^2 - y^2} \, dy##, which is particularly elementary. (Of course, the x-component of the centroid is zero, by symmetry.)
Also, if you did it this way, it's essentially the same calculation for both the portion of the circle cut off and the part you were actually interested in. The only difference would have been the limits. Steamking's suggestion had occurred to me, but I realized it wasn't actually all that helpful for this particular problem.
 
  • #9
engg05 said:
Thank you all for your input.

SteamKing - your approach was great thank you for your help.

Final solution:

[tex]C_y = \frac{\pi r^3-\frac{r^2\left(r+\frac{4rsin^3(\frac{\theta}{2})}{3(\theta-sin\theta)}\right)\left(\theta-sin\theta\right)}{2}}{\pi r^2-\frac{r^2\left(\theta-sin\theta\right)}{2}}[/tex]

Fairly certain this only works between 0 and r which is precisely what I was after.

Thanks again.
This result doesn't look right to me. It's way too complicated. And what is ##\theta##? How come ##c## doesn't appear in your answer?
 
  • #10
I simplified the problem definition by using a set of expressions that already solved for the circle segment rather than deriving anything myself. [itex]\theta[/itex] is a function of the cut location [itex]c[/itex].

CircularSegmentGen00.gif


I subtracted moments between a full circle and the shape above to leave me with the "remaining" geometry. The same applies for the area. Dividing the moments by area leaves me the aforementioned expression. SteamKing's approach is correct.

vela - good thing I made sure it was right posted the solution!
 
  • #11
engg05 said:
I simplified the problem definition by using a set of expressions that already solved for the circle segment rather than deriving anything myself. [itex]\theta[/itex] is a function of the cut location [itex]c[/itex].

CircularSegmentGen00.gif


I subtracted moments between a full circle and the shape above to leave me with the "remaining" geometry. The same applies for the area. Dividing the moments by area leaves me the aforementioned expression. SteamKing's approach is correct.

vela - good thing I made sure it was right posted the solution!

If you use this figure as a guide to calculating the moments of the full circle and the circular segment, you can make this calculation simpler by computing moments about the center of the full circle.

In this case, the moment of the full circle about the center is zero, since the center point lies on all axes of symmetry for the circle.

The moment of the circular segment is Ms = As ⋅ Cy, where As is the area of the segment.

The centroid of the remaining area will be displaced a distance ##\bar y## below the center of the full circle,

$$\bar y = \frac{0 - A_s ⋅ C_y}{πr^2 - A_s}$$

If you want to refer ##\bar y## from the center of the full circle to say the point on the +y axis where the full circle crosses (0, y), then

$$\bar y' = r - \bar y$$,

recognizing that ##\bar y## as formulated above will be negative and lie on the negative y-axis somewhere.
vela said:
This result doesn't look right to me. It's way too complicated.

vela is right. The result given in Post #5 is way too complicated, and it doesn't look right.
 

1. What is the purpose of using integrals to solve for the area and center of mass of a cut circle?

The purpose of using integrals in this scenario is to find precise and accurate measurements for the area and center of mass of a non-standard geometric shape. A cut circle, or a circle with a portion removed, cannot be easily solved using basic geometry, so integrals provide a mathematical method for calculating these values.

2. How do you set up the integral for finding the area of a cut circle?

To find the area of a cut circle using integrals, you would set up a definite integral that represents the area enclosed by the curve of the circle. This integral would have upper and lower bounds that correspond to the coordinates of the points where the circle is cut. The integrand would be the equation of the circle, and the integral would be evaluated over the given bounds.

3. Can integrals also be used to find the center of mass of a cut circle?

Yes, integrals can also be used to find the center of mass of a cut circle. This involves setting up a double integral, with one integral representing the x-coordinate of the center of mass and the other representing the y-coordinate. The integrand for each integral would be the product of the density function and the corresponding coordinate value, and the integral would be evaluated over the area of the cut circle.

4. What if the cut circle has varying density throughout its area?

If the cut circle has varying density, then the integrand in the double integral for finding the center of mass would need to be multiplied by the density function. This accounts for the varying density and allows for an accurate calculation of the center of mass. The same concept applies for finding the area, as the integral would need to be multiplied by the density function.

5. Are there any limitations to using integrals for solving for the area and center of mass of a cut circle?

The limitations for using integrals in this scenario would depend on the specific shape and complexity of the cut circle. In some cases, it may be difficult to set up the integrals or to evaluate them if the shape is very irregular. Additionally, this method may not be practical for physical objects with varying density and irregular shapes, as it would require accurate and precise measurements of the density and shape. In these cases, other methods such as numerical integration or computer simulations may be more suitable.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
571
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
979
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
298
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
963
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
496
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
556
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
854
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
770
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
663
Back
Top