Proving rationals cannot have dense orbit in Cantor set

This contradicts the definition of a dense set, which requires that every nonempty, open subinterval of C must intersect with A. In summary, a rational number in the Cantor set cannot have a dense orbit because its decimal representation will eventually repeat, leading to a finite number of elements in its orbit within any given subinterval of C.
  • #1
razmtaz
25
0

Homework Statement



Let C be the standard Cantor "middle third" set (ie Ck = {x:0[itex]\leq[/itex]T[itex]^{k}_{3/2}(x)[/itex][itex]\leq[/itex]1} and C = [itex]\bigcap[/itex][itex]^{inf}_{k=0}[/itex]Ck
where T[itex]^{k}_{3/2} = 3x if x<1/2,
= 3 - 3x if x \geq[/itex] 1/2)

Show that a rational number x = p/q [itex]\in[/itex] C cannot have dense orbit in C.

Homework Equations



{T[itex]^{k}_{3/2}[/itex](x)}[itex]^{inf}_{k=0}[/itex] is the orbit of x.

Def A subset A of the interval J is dense in J if A intersects every nonempty open subinterval of J.

The Attempt at a Solution



Want to show that the orbit A = {T[itex]^{k}_{3/2}[/itex](x)}[itex]^{inf}_{k=0}[/itex] of any rational number x = p/q is not dense in C. so we want to show that NOT every nonempty, open subinterval of C intersects with the orbit A (negation of definition of being dense). So what it comes down to (I think) is finding some element of C that is not in the orbit. the trouble is, I don't know exactly what will be in the orbit for any given rational number. The orbit will obviously contain all rational numbers, so do I just need to find some irrational element in C?

for example, 2/3 is in C, and 2/3 = 0.2000... in base 3, so if we let y = 0.20200200020000200000... then a) its irrational (right?) and b) its not in the orbit A since its irrational, so the orbit can't be dense.

Im having a lot of difficulty with the concepts here (dense sets, dense orbit, the cantor set in general) so any insight is appreciated. thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


your goal is to provide a clear and logical explanation for why a rational number cannot have a dense orbit in the Cantor set. Here is a possible solution:

First, let's define the Cantor set C as the set of numbers that can be written in base 3 using only the digits 0 and 2. This means that any rational number x = p/q in C can be written as a repeating decimal in base 3, such as 0.202020... for x = 2/3.

Next, let's consider the orbit A of x in C. This is the set of all numbers that can be obtained by repeatedly applying the function T^{k}_{3/2} to x. In other words, A = {T^{k}_{3/2}(x)}^{inf}_{k=0}.

Now, let's assume that the orbit A is dense in C. This means that for any nonempty, open subinterval of C, there exists an element of A that is also in that subinterval. In other words, for any interval (a,b) in C, there exists an element of A that is also in (a,b).

However, we can show that this is not the case for the rational number x = p/q. Since x is a rational number, its decimal representation in base 3 will eventually repeat. In the case of x = 2/3, the decimal representation is 0.202020... which repeats every two digits. This means that there are only a finite number of elements of A that are in the interval (0,0.1), and therefore, there must exist some subinterval (a,b) of (0,0.1) that does not contain any element of A. This contradicts our assumption that A is dense in C.

Therefore, we can conclude that a rational number x = p/q in C cannot have a dense orbit in C. This is because the decimal representation of x in base 3 will eventually repeat, leading to a finite number of elements in the orbit A within any given subinterval of C.
 

1. What is the Cantor set?

The Cantor set is a mathematical set that is constructed by removing a middle third of a line segment, and then repeating the process on the remaining line segments infinitely. The resulting set is a perfect example of a fractal, as it is self-similar at every scale.

2. What does it mean for a rational number to have a dense orbit in the Cantor set?

A rational number has a dense orbit in the Cantor set if, when it is represented on the number line, its digits appear infinitely many times in the set. This means that the rational number is contained in every subinterval of the Cantor set, no matter how small.

3. Why is it impossible for rationals to have a dense orbit in the Cantor set?

This is due to the properties of the Cantor set, which is constructed by continuously removing middle thirds of line segments. As a result, the set contains an infinite number of gaps, making it impossible for any rational number to have a dense orbit.

4. How can this be proven mathematically?

This can be proven using a proof by contradiction. Assume that a rational number has a dense orbit in the Cantor set, and then show that this leads to a contradiction. This will prove that the initial assumption was false, and therefore, rationals cannot have a dense orbit in the Cantor set.

5. What implications does this have for the Cantor set and rational numbers?

This has significant implications for our understanding of the Cantor set and rational numbers. It shows that the Cantor set, despite being constructed from rational numbers, contains gaps that cannot be filled by any rational number. This highlights the complexity and infinite nature of fractals and irrational numbers.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
512
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
283
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
558
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
993
Back
Top