- #1
dRic2
Gold Member
- 883
- 225
- TL;DR Summary
- Are you familiar with a more or less rigorous argument that proves the independence of the density of states for a gas of non interacting particles form its surroundings?
Most undergrad textbook simply say that it is intuitive that boundary conditions should not play a role if the box is very large. Other textbooks suggest that this should be taken for granted since the number of particles at the surface are orders of magnitude smaller that the number of bulk particles. These books then proceed to show the equivalence for the specific case of periodic boundary conditions and the "particle-in-a-box"-like boundary conditions. I like this intuitive approach, but I would like to get at least a more mathematical intuition of why all of this works.
I also noticed that the famous density of states for a free particle ##\frac V {(2 \pi)^3}## is shared also by electrons in Bloch's states in a lattice. Is that a coincidence or is there a reason ? I mean, electron in a lattice should a potential which is not invariant under an arbitrary translation, so I find it a bit strange that the density of states is the same.
Thanks Ric
I also noticed that the famous density of states for a free particle ##\frac V {(2 \pi)^3}## is shared also by electrons in Bloch's states in a lattice. Is that a coincidence or is there a reason ? I mean, electron in a lattice should a potential which is not invariant under an arbitrary translation, so I find it a bit strange that the density of states is the same.
Thanks Ric