Tidal Potential & Binomial Approximation

In summary, the conversation discusses the derivation of the formula for tidal potential as given by the text, and the attempt to replicate it for a point on the horizontal axis. The conversation also addresses issues with the formula, such as incorrect signs and incorrect coefficients, and provides guidance for correcting them.
  • #1
McCoy13
74
0

Homework Statement


There is a derivation in the text that I'm having problems replicating. The text gives the formula for tidal potential as:

[tex]U_{tid}=-GM_{m}m(\frac{1}{d}-\frac{x}{d^{2}_{0}})[/tex]

Where [itex]M_{m}[/itex] is the mass of the moon, d is the distance from the CM of the moon to the point of interest on the surface of the Earth, [itex]d_{0}[/itex] is the distance between the CM of the moon and the CM of the earth, and x as the lateral distance of the point.

I'm having trouble deriving the potential for a point on the horizontal axis. That is [itex]d=d_{0}-r[/itex] where r is the radius of the earth, and [itex]x=-r[/itex]

Homework Equations


The text gives the answer as

[tex]U_{tid}=-\frac{GM_{m}m}{d_{0}}(1+\frac{r^{2}}{d^{2}_{0}})[/tex]

It suggests using the binomial approximation of

[tex](1+x)^{-1/2}=1-\frac{x}{2}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]U_{tid}=-GM_{m}m(\frac{1}{\sqrt{(d_{0}-r)^{2}}}+\frac{r}{d^{2}_{0}})[/tex]

[tex]U_{tid}=-GM_{m}m(\frac{1}{d_{0}\sqrt{1-2\frac{r}{d_{0}}+\frac{r^{2}}{d^{2}_{0}}}}+\frac{r}{d^{2}_{0}})[/tex]

[tex]U_{tid}=-\frac{GM_{m}m}{d_{0}}(1+\frac{r}{d_{0}}-\frac{r^{2}}{2d^{2}_{0}}+\frac{r}{d^{2}_{0}})[/tex]

It is unclear to me where to proceed from here, as there are no like terms and putting them in terms of a common denominator does not seem to help. I thought of perhaps needing to do an additional binomial approximation, but it is unclear to me how that would help or even how I would go about doing it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Things are a bit confusing, since you don't explain the physical significance of the terms in

[tex]
U_{tid}=-GM_{m}m(\frac{1}{d}-\frac{x}{d^{2}_{0}})
[/tex]

From first principles, the potential due to the moon on an element on the horizontal axis is

[tex] U = =-GM_{m}m \frac{1}{d_0 -r} \sim - \frac{GM_{m}m }{d_0} \left( 1 + \frac{r}{d_0} + \frac{r^2}{d_0^2} + \cdots \right). [/tex]

The first term is constant and doesn't product a force. The second term produces a constant force, which is what keeps the Earth-Moon system bound. Since this term doesn't cause tides, your book seems to be subtracting it from the potential U to define the tidal potential

[tex]
U_{tid}= U - \left(- \frac{GM_{m}m r}{d_0^2} \right) = - GM_{m}m \left( \frac{1}{d} - \frac{r}{d_0^2} \right). ~~(*)
[/tex]

I'm not sure why you claim there is a sign difference between [tex]r[/tex] and [tex]x[/tex], but I've given a physical argument for the sign in the equation (*) above.

With the correct sign, you'll be much closer to obtaining the correct answer. However, your formula

[tex]
U_{tid}=-\frac{GM_{m}m}{d_{0}}(1+\frac{r}{d_{0}}-\frac{r^{2}}{2d^{2}_{0}}+\frac{r}{d^{2}_{0}})
[/tex]

has a couple more problems. First there is a problem with the factor of [tex]d_0[/tex] in the last term that should be straightforward to clear up. Secondly you should take your expansion

[tex]
(1+x)^{-1/2}=1-\frac{x}{2}
[/tex]

out to quadratic order since you are interested in computing terms of [tex]O(r^2)[/tex]. This will correct the coefficient of the quadratic term.
 
  • #3
fzero said:
Things are a bit confusing, since you don't explain the physical significance of the terms in

[tex]
U_{tid}=-GM_{m}m(\frac{1}{d}-\frac{x}{d^{2}_{0}})
[/tex]

From first principles, the potential due to the moon on an element on the horizontal axis is

[tex] U = =-GM_{m}m \frac{1}{d_0 -r} \sim - \frac{GM_{m}m }{d_0} \left( 1 + \frac{r}{d_0} + \frac{r^2}{d_0^2} + \cdots \right). [/tex]

The first term is constant and doesn't product a force. The second term produces a constant force, which is what keeps the Earth-Moon system bound. Since this term doesn't cause tides, your book seems to be subtracting it from the potential U to define the tidal potential

[tex]
U_{tid}= U - \left(- \frac{GM_{m}m r}{d_0^2} \right) = - GM_{m}m \left( \frac{1}{d} - \frac{r}{d_0^2} \right). ~~(*)
[/tex]

The book derives the potential as an illustration as the utility of non-inertial reference frames. It says that for a mass m, the acceleration relative to the non-inertial reference frame is given by the usual sum of the forces (gravitation with both the Earth and the moon) plus an inertial force (in the case the mass times the centripetal acceleration of the Earth towards the moon). This leads to

[tex]m\ddot{r}=mg+F_{tid}+F_{ng}[/tex]

Where [itex]F_{ng}[/itex] are any non-gravitational forces (e.g. buoyancy) and

[tex]F_{tid}=-GM_{m}m(\frac{\hat{d}}{d^{2}}-\frac{\hat{d_{0}}}{d^{2}_{0}})[/tex]

They simply treat force as the negative gradient on d and x to get U, it seems.

fzero said:
I'm not sure why you claim there is a sign difference between [tex]r[/tex] and [tex]x[/tex], but I've given a physical argument for the sign in the equation (*) above.
Yeah, that was a mistake.

fzero said:
With the correct sign, you'll be much closer to obtaining the correct answer. However, your formula

[tex]
U_{tid}=-\frac{GM_{m}m}{d_{0}}(1+\frac{r}{d_{0}}-\frac{r^{2}}{2d^{2}_{0}}+\frac{r}{d^{2}_{0}})
[/tex]

has a couple more problems. First there is a problem with the factor of [tex]d_0[/tex] in the last term that should be straightforward to clear up. Secondly you should take your expansion

[tex]
(1+x)^{-1/2}=1-\frac{x}{2}
[/tex]

out to quadratic order since you are interested in computing terms of [tex]O(r^2)[/tex]. This will correct the coefficient of the quadratic term.
I'll take a look at this in the morning, but I think I see how it goes now. I forgot to factor out a [itex]d_{0}[/itex] of the last term when I factored it out from the square root, and so that will cancel with the other term once I fix the signs. As for fixing the coefficient, that's going to take some algebra for me to get, and instead I'm going to sleep for now.

Thanks for your help.
 
  • #4
Taking the approximation to the second order you get a coefficient of +3/8, and the only term that survives is (2r/do)^2 giving coefficients of -1/2+3/2 = 1. Thanks again!
 
  • #5

The derivation of tidal potential can be a complex and challenging process, so it's understandable that you are having trouble replicating it. One important thing to note is that the formula given in the text is for a point on the surface of the Earth, not on the horizontal axis. This means that the distance, d, should be the distance from the center of the Moon to the point on the surface of the Earth, not the distance from the center of the Moon to the horizontal axis.

To derive the potential for a point on the horizontal axis, we need to consider the distance, d, to be the distance from the center of the Moon to the horizontal axis, which is d = d_0 - r. This means that the formula for tidal potential would be:

U_{tid} = -GM_m m \left(\frac{1}{d_0 - r} - \frac{x}{(d_0 - r)^2}\right)

Substituting x = -r, we get:

U_{tid} = -GM_m m \left(\frac{1}{d_0 - r} - \frac{-r}{(d_0 - r)^2}\right)

Simplifying this further, we get:

U_{tid} = -\frac{GM_m m}{d_0} \left(1 + \frac{r}{d_0}\right)

This is similar to the formula given in the text, but with an additional term of r/d_0. Now, to use the binomial approximation, we can rewrite the term (1 + r/d_0)^{-1/2} as (1 - (-r/d_0))^{-1/2}. This is because the binomial approximation we are using is for (1 + x)^{-1/2}. So, we get:

U_{tid} = -\frac{GM_m m}{d_0} \left(1 - \frac{r}{2d_0}\right)^{-1/2}

Using the binomial approximation, we get:

U_{tid} \approx -\frac{GM_m m}{d_0} \left(1 - \frac{r}{2d_0} \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right) = -\frac{GM_m m}{d_0} \left(1 - \frac{r}{4d_0}\right
 

Related to Tidal Potential & Binomial Approximation

1. What is tidal potential?

Tidal potential refers to the difference in the gravitational pull of the moon and the sun on the Earth's oceans. This difference creates a force that causes tides in the ocean.

2. How does tidal potential affect the tides?

The tidal potential affects the tides by creating a bulge in the ocean on the side of the Earth that is facing the moon and a bulge on the opposite side. As the Earth rotates, these bulges move around the planet, causing high and low tides.

3. What is binomial approximation in relation to tidal potential?

Binomial approximation is a mathematical method used to estimate the amplitude or height of tides based on the position of the moon and sun. It takes into account the gravitational forces of both bodies and the distance between them to approximate the tidal height.

4. Why is binomial approximation useful for studying tidal potential?

Binomial approximation is useful for studying tidal potential because it provides a simplified way to understand and predict tides. It allows scientists to calculate tides without needing to know specific details about the Earth's shape, rotation, and ocean depth, making it a valuable tool for tidal research.

5. Can binomial approximation accurately predict tides?

Binomial approximation is a good estimation method for predicting tides, but it is not always accurate. Factors such as weather, ocean currents, and local geography can affect the actual height and timing of tides. However, it is still a valuable tool for understanding the general patterns and effects of tidal potential.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
885
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
552
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
740
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
438
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
419
Replies
16
Views
613
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
912
Back
Top