- #1
Bogrune
- 60
- 0
I don't really know if "easier" is the right word for this question, but I'm undecided about whether I should take trignonometry-based physics in order to get ready for calculus-based physics.
I heard from numerous students that calc.-based physics is probably one of the hardest classes that I'll take. At the same time, other students told me that Accounting 101 was going to be a lot harder than Accounting 100, but I found Accounting 101 a lot easier than Acc. 100, and the reason for that is because Acc. 100 was a lot more simple and to-the-point, but I felt like that was the reason that I found the more basic class harder than the more advanced class. Thus, I felt like I never really needed Acc. 100 to get ready for Acc. 101. Will it be the same story for Trig-based physics and Calc-based physics?
I heard from numerous students that calc.-based physics is probably one of the hardest classes that I'll take. At the same time, other students told me that Accounting 101 was going to be a lot harder than Accounting 100, but I found Accounting 101 a lot easier than Acc. 100, and the reason for that is because Acc. 100 was a lot more simple and to-the-point, but I felt like that was the reason that I found the more basic class harder than the more advanced class. Thus, I felt like I never really needed Acc. 100 to get ready for Acc. 101. Will it be the same story for Trig-based physics and Calc-based physics?