Packing Particles - Understanding Coordination Number & Density

  • Thread starter Thread starter yellowduck
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between coordination number and density in the context of different atomic packing methods, specifically hexagonal closest packing, face-centered cubic (FCC), and body-centered cubic (BCC) structures. Participants are exploring calculations related to packing density and addressing misunderstandings in their approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their lab work on packing methods and expresses confusion about the relationship between coordination number and density, noting an incorrect calculation that suggests body-centered packing has a higher density.
  • Another participant suggests searching for previous discussions on similar topics, providing links to past threads that may contain relevant information.
  • A participant attempts to calculate the volume of spheres in a cubic arrangement but questions their results, noting a discrepancy between their calculations and the expected packing density of 74%.
  • Another participant critiques the calculation method used by the previous poster, explaining the correct approach to determine the number of atoms in an FCC unit cell and how to relate atomic radius to unit cell dimensions, ultimately providing a formula for packing density.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus on the calculations or the understanding of packing density. There are competing views on the correct approach to the problem, and some participants express confusion about the methodology.

Contextual Notes

Some calculations and assumptions made by participants are not fully clarified, leading to potential misunderstandings. The discussion includes unresolved mathematical steps and varying interpretations of the packing density concept.

yellowduck
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I am doing a lab on packing methods. Hexagonal closest, face-centred and body-centred.

I had no trouble drawing the diagrams for these and and determining cordination numbers and seeing which is more efficient. However I am having trouble explaining the relationship between coordination number and density. It gives mass/volume as the definition of density.

What I did was place one unit in an imaginary box - assign each atom a value of 1 mass and divide by volume. This gives me a higher density for body-centred which I know is wrong.

Can anyone help explain to me what I am doing wrong?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok this seems to help but I still don't quite have it.

Lets do a test on say cubic and give an imagingary radius of 1 for each of the 13 units
V = (4/3)Pi r^3
= 1.33 x 3.14 x 1
= 4.2 x 13 units = 54.6 units of volume in 13 spheres

Sphere volume (radius would be 3)
V= (4/3)pi r^3
= 1.33 x 3.14 x 27
= 113 units

54.6 / 113 = 48.3?? (I have read that it is 74% so I did something wrong but can't put my finger on it)
 
Where are you getting 13 and 3 from? Your approach - which I can't say I understand - appears to be wrong. Here's how you do it.

You have an FCC lattice. Look at the unit cell - it has 8 corner atoms and 6 face centers. Each corner atom is shared by 8 neighboring unit cells and each face center atom is shared by two. So the total number of atoms per unit cell in the FCC lattice = (8*1/8) + (6*1/2) = 1+3 = 4

Nearest neighbor atoms ("touching" each other) may be found along a face diagonal. If the side of the unit cell is 'a', the length of the face diagonal is a*sqrt(2) = about 1.4a. Going from one corner to another, along the face diagonal, you encounter the radius of the first corner atom, then the diameter of the face center atom, and finally the radius of the second corner atom. In terms of the atomic radius, the length of the face diagonal is then r + 2r + r. So, we have 1.4a = 4r or roughly a = 2.83r

That establishes a relationship between the sphere radius and the unit cell size. Next you say that the unit cell volume is a^3, and the volume occupied by spheres is 4*(4/3)*pi*r^3. The 4 comes from the number of atoms per unit cell, calculated abouve. The packing density is then the ratio of the second volume to the first.

PD = [(16/3)*pi*r^3]/[a^3] = 16.75*r^3/a^3 = [16.75]/[2.83^3] = 16.75/22.62 = 0.74
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
23K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
23K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K