How Are Fossilized Rocks Like This Leaf Formed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimmy Snyder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formation Rock
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the discovery of a fossilized leaf within a layered rock, presumed to be sedimentary in nature. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the rock's formation and the bonding strength of its layers. Initially, they speculate that the rock's rigidity in horizontal directions and weaker bonds in vertical directions might be due to the sediment's compression and hardening process. However, they later revise their understanding, noting that the vertical and horizontal bonds are equally strong, and the rock can only be split at specific points, suggesting a complex layering process. Participants in the discussion recommend researching lithification and diagenesis to better understand the rock's formation, highlighting that the weakest bonds typically occur between bedding planes, which can influence how the rock breaks. The conversation reflects a fascination with fossils and sedimentary rock formation processes.
Jimmy Snyder
Messages
1,122
Reaction score
22
A friend and colleague found a fossil and brought it into show me. It is a small leaf in a rock. He asked me how the rock was formed, but I couldn't say as I know nothing of such things. The rock is layered. You can see the various layers by looking at the rock edgewise. In fact, the edge is so ragged that you can see fossils of leaves in several places. It looks like you could peel the layers of the rock. Indeed, the ragged edge shows that the bonds in one of the axes are weaker than those in the other two. I guess this is sedementary rock formed by layers of silt building up and then compressed into hardness. The rock is quite hard, not like compacted silt, but more like melted and recongealed silt.

My question is what could cause the silt to form such rigid bonds in the horizontal directions and such weak ones in the vertical direction? Or have I got the whole picture messed up?

Edit- Now that I think about it a little more, the bonds in the vertical direction are just as strong as the ones in the horizontal direction. The rock can only be split at certain places. Perhaps 50 per inch or so. It's as if the sedement collected and hardened before the next layer was deposited. But what could make it harden?
 
Last edited:
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
You are correct. It is sedimentary rock - highly layered.

Wiki seems to have a pretty good description of the process.
 
DaveC426913 said:
You are correct.
It's a rare pleasure.

Which article should I look at?
 
Fossils are so cool, i have some of tiny sea creatures about 2mm, and i can still see patterns in the shells, to think they are millions of years old, i value them more than
most things.
 
jimmysnyder said:
A friend and colleague found a fossil and brought it into show me. It is a small leaf in a rock. He asked me how the rock was formed, but I couldn't say as I know nothing of such things. The rock is layered. You can see the various layers by looking at the rock edgewise. In fact, the edge is so ragged that you can see fossils of leaves in several places. It looks like you could peel the layers of the rock. Indeed, the ragged edge shows that the bonds in one of the axes are weaker than those in the other two. I guess this is sedementary rock formed by layers of silt building up and then compressed into hardness. The rock is quite hard, not like compacted silt, but more like melted and recongealed silt.

My question is what could cause the silt to form such rigid bonds in the horizontal directions and such weak ones in the vertical direction? Or have I got the whole picture messed up?

Edit- Now that I think about it a little more, the bonds in the vertical direction are just as strong as the ones in the horizontal direction. The rock can only be split at certain places. Perhaps 50 per inch or so. It's as if the sedement collected and hardened before the next layer was deposited. But what could make it harden?

Chances are, by your description, it's a siltstone. Check out lithification and diagenesis on wiki, although not sure if these pages are what Dave was referring to. Also, about bonding, the wekest bonds will in general be between bedding planes, which gives the rock a bulk strength which is weakest in the direction parallel to the bedding planes; you might also notice that it prefers to break at an angle (perhaps 60 degrees) from the bedding, check out cleavage.
 
jimmysnyder said:
It's a rare pleasure.

Which article should I look at?

'sedimentary rock' would be good
 
Thread 'The Secrets of Prof. Verschure's Rosetta Stones'
(Edit: since the thread title was changed, this first sentence is too cryptic: the original title referred to a Tool song....) Besides being a favorite song by a favorite band, the thread title is a straightforward play on words. This summer, as a present to myself for being promoted, I purchased a collection of thin sections that I believe comprise the research materials of Prof. Rob Verschure, who at the time was faculty in the Geological Institute in Amsterdam. What changed this...

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
404
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
10K
Back
Top