Barycentric Julian Date (astronomy)

  • Thread starter Thread starter big man
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Astronomy
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on converting Barycentric Julian Date (BJD) to Universal Time (UT), specifically addressing the relationship between Terrestrial Time (TT) and light propagation corrections. BJD is defined as the observation epoch corrected for light travel time to the solar system barycenter, while TT is a time standard that can differ significantly from UTC. The conversion process can be complex, but an online calculator is available for converting BJD in Barycentric Dynamical Time (BJD_TDB) to Coordinated Universal Time (JD_UTC). It's noted that UT can refer to various standards, with UTC being the most commonly used for practical purposes. A deeper understanding of these time standards and their implications in astronomy can be found in linked resources.
big man
Messages
241
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm wanting to convert barycentric julian date to the equivalent UT time. Here is a description of the barycentric julian date given to us:

Barycentric Julian Date (TT) – Observation epoch, given in terrestrial time, that has been corrected for light propagation time to the solar system barycentre.

The Attempt at a Solution


Now I know how to convert Julian date to UT and I know that Terrestrial Time = UT + \delta T, where the value dT can be obtained from the web. But I really wouldn't say that I understand or have found a definition of TT that makes me understand exactly what it is. Is the correction for light propagation time to the solar system barycentre just terrestrial time?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My apologies for reviving such a long-dead thread, but as it's still one of the top hits for Barycentric Julian Date, some may benefit from a belated answer, if not the original poster.

big man said:
I'm wanting to convert barycentric julian date to the equivalent UT time.

UT is an ambiguous term and may mean UTC, UT1, or many other variants, all of which may vary by up to 0.9 seconds from one another. As you've described it, you're talking about UT1. However, you probably actually want UTC (if you care about the difference at all), since UTC is the international standard, and what your clock is most likely to use. It's also much easier to calculate, as it depends on discrete leap seconds, not the continuously variable quantity \delta t.

If I'm right about that, or you don't care about the 0.9 second difference, you can use my online calculator (http://astroutils.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/time/bjd2utc.html), which converts from Barycentric Julian Date in Barycentric Dynamical Time (BJD_TDB) to the Julian Date in Coordinated Universal Time (JD_UTC) for objects outside of the solar system.

Note: BJD_TDB is the same as BJD in Terrestial Time (BJD_TT) to with +/- 1.7 ms.

Doing the precise conversion yourself is extremely involved (see the paper linked at the end of my response for the steps if you really want to...).

big man said:
Is the correction for light propagation time to the solar system barycentre just terrestrial time?

No, the observed time corrected for the light propagation time from the observer to the Solar System Barycenter is the Barycentric Julian Date (BJD). However, the BJD can be specified in any time standard (eg, TT, TDB, UTC, etc).

Terrestrial Time (TT) is a time standard. Wikipedia has an excellent article describing it if you care about the details. The important thing is that it is commonly used in astronomical timing and can differ from UTC by more than 1 minute.

A more thorough explanation of the BJD, time standards, and more than you ever wanted to know about astronomical timing can be found in my paper:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.4415
 
At first, I derived that: $$\nabla \frac 1{\mu}=-\frac 1{{\mu}^3}\left((1-\beta^2)+\frac{\dot{\vec\beta}\cdot\vec R}c\right)\vec R$$ (dot means differentiation with respect to ##t'##). I assume this result is true because it gives valid result for magnetic field. To find electric field one should also derive partial derivative of ##\vec A## with respect to ##t##. I've used chain rule, substituted ##\vec A## and used derivative of product formula. $$\frac {\partial \vec A}{\partial t}=\frac...
Thread 'Conducting Sphere and Dipole Problem'
Hi, I'm stuck at this question, please help. Attempt to the Conducting Sphere and Dipole Problem (a) Electric Field and Potential at O due to Induced Charges $$V_O = 0$$ This potential is the sum of the potentials due to the real charges (##+q, -q##) and the induced charges on the sphere. $$V_O = V_{\text{real}} + V_{\text{induced}} = 0$$ - Electric Field at O, ##\vec{E}_O##: Since point O is inside a conductor in electrostatic equilibrium, the electric field there must be zero...