Recent content by Anti-Crackpot
-
A
Question re: Deuterium Emission Spectrum
Thank you again for the feedback Mike and Dr. Du. Interesting stuff and a clear example of how little things can add up to a lot. I can't help but wonder if, even without Einstein, one could have eventually deduced e=mc^2 from measurements of mass had, of course, those measurements been precise...- Anti-Crackpot
- Post #14
- Forum: Chemistry
-
A
Question re: Deuterium Emission Spectrum
Why is it that the deuteron mass is less than the sum of it's parts? Or am I framing the question incorrectly? - AC- Anti-Crackpot
- Post #11
- Forum: Chemistry
-
A
Question re: Deuterium Emission Spectrum
For anyone who comes along this way with a similar question or questions as I had when I began this thread, here, for better or for worse, is a summary of my recent calculations. Corrections or improvements to the data most welcome. Based on CODATA 2010 values... 9.10938291(40)*10^-31 kg =...- Anti-Crackpot
- Post #10
- Forum: Chemistry
-
A
Question re: Deuterium Emission Spectrum
@ Mike and Dr. Du. Thanks for the responses. I re-ran the numbers with the correct Deuteron mass and the change was negligible. Here is a link to a set of data from the Kitt Peak National Observatory using the correction of 1.000288 to correct angstrom measurements in vacuo to angstron...- Anti-Crackpot
- Post #8
- Forum: Chemistry
-
A
Question re: Deuterium Emission Spectrum
Well, getting closer to getting a fix on this (maybe), but not sure if I am theorizing correctly that the difference between theoretical values and observed values is due to the refractive index of air. Any help would be appreciated. In the meantime a bit of data... Using Balmer_H (B_H)...- Anti-Crackpot
- Post #5
- Forum: Chemistry
-
A
Question re: Deuterium Emission Spectrum
So, the next question, assuming I have calculated correctly above, is this: How does one work into the equations the refractive index of air? Does one. for instance, simply divide wavelength by ~1.00029 to get observed values? e.g. 656.281 = H_alpha = 656.469 / 1.00028646 = 656.281. H-alpha...- Anti-Crackpot
- Post #4
- Forum: Chemistry
-
A
Question re: Deuterium Emission Spectrum
In response to Dr. Du's feedback, and on the basis of CODATA 2010 values... 9.10938291*10^-31 kg: electron mass 1.672621777*10^-27 kg: proton mass 1.674927351*10^-27 kg: neutron mass 1.0973731568539 * 10^7 m^-1: Rydberg Constant ... here is what I calculate to be the first five lines in the...- Anti-Crackpot
- Post #3
- Forum: Chemistry
-
A
Question re: Deuterium Emission Spectrum
Deuterium Spectrum (nm) 410.07, 433.93, 486.01, 656.11 I came upon these figures on a commercial product site for Deuterium lamps. So, question: Are they correct? If so, then... 364.5068222*(3^2/(3^2 - 4)) = 656.11 364.5068222*(4^2/(4^2 - 4)) = 486.01 364.5068222*(5^2/(5^2 - 4)) = 433.93...- Anti-Crackpot
- Thread
- Deuterium Emission Emission spectrum Spectrum
- Replies: 14
- Forum: Chemistry
-
A
High School Mass of Electron: 9.10938291x10-31 kg
I realize this topic is a bit dated, but still worth a quick follow-up... Well... no, actually. As Khashishi noted, the 4 and 0 relate to standard uncertainty and are associated with the last two digits 9, 1, meaning that the value for electron mass is probably 9.10938291*10^-31 kg, plus or...- Anti-Crackpot
- Post #5
- Forum: Electromagnetism
-
A
Graduate Proof of ∏(√n) Increment for Centered Polygonal Numbers w/ Prime Index
I'm not sure what you mean by "analogous to polygonal numbers." Oblong numbers map 1:1 to triangular numbers (= 2 times a triangular number) and triangular numbers are one kind of polygonal number, but Polygonal numbers in general? It's true that the polygonal numbers can be constructed from...- Anti-Crackpot
- Post #6
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
A
Graduate An issue with the vector model of spin and its operators
Can't say as I understand your Flash model, but it sure does look cool, Jeremy. Feel free to explain it a bit more. Also, since you mentioned spin 5/2... ... here is a purely numerological observation that may or may not be of interest to you in relation to Stan Sykora's comments here at...- Anti-Crackpot
- Post #8
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
A
High School An odd coincidence or just nothing?
I'm not a physicist, Jack, but you might want to familiarize yourself with the Lorentz Factor at the very least. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_factor If you want to know more, maybe post a topic in the General Physics section of the site. I'd gander that folks who can explain it far...- Anti-Crackpot
- Post #4
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
A
High School An odd coincidence or just nothing?
Sorry to burst your bubble, Jack, but all you've discovered is that 86400/299792458 is close to .0003 - AC- Anti-Crackpot
- Post #2
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
A
Graduate Is There a Predictable Pattern in Prime Exponent Series Gaps?
Mandelbra, Unfortunately, I have no paper to link to, and by no means is that failing for a lack of searching; but here's a little example of what I mean from the 29th row of the Eulerian Triangle (data courtesy of OEIS). Check any of these values modulo 29 and you'll get the same answer: 1...- Anti-Crackpot
- Post #8
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
A
Graduate Conjecture regarding perfect numbers.
FWIW, all Mersenne Prime Exponents > 3 are congruent to 1, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19 or 23 (mod 24), which happens to be the automorphism group for 24 (8 total self-mappings). This follows from the fact that all Mersenne Prime exponents are prime and therefore follow the form n = 6x +/- 1 for n >3. - AC- Anti-Crackpot
- Post #11
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra