Recent content by Anti-Crackpot

  1. A

    Question re: Deuterium Emission Spectrum

    Thank you again for the feedback Mike and Dr. Du. Interesting stuff and a clear example of how little things can add up to a lot. I can't help but wonder if, even without Einstein, one could have eventually deduced e=mc^2 from measurements of mass had, of course, those measurements been precise...
  2. A

    Question re: Deuterium Emission Spectrum

    Why is it that the deuteron mass is less than the sum of it's parts? Or am I framing the question incorrectly? - AC
  3. A

    Question re: Deuterium Emission Spectrum

    For anyone who comes along this way with a similar question or questions as I had when I began this thread, here, for better or for worse, is a summary of my recent calculations. Corrections or improvements to the data most welcome. Based on CODATA 2010 values... 9.10938291(40)*10^-31 kg =...
  4. A

    Question re: Deuterium Emission Spectrum

    @ Mike and Dr. Du. Thanks for the responses. I re-ran the numbers with the correct Deuteron mass and the change was negligible. Here is a link to a set of data from the Kitt Peak National Observatory using the correction of 1.000288 to correct angstrom measurements in vacuo to angstron...
  5. A

    Question re: Deuterium Emission Spectrum

    Well, getting closer to getting a fix on this (maybe), but not sure if I am theorizing correctly that the difference between theoretical values and observed values is due to the refractive index of air. Any help would be appreciated. In the meantime a bit of data... Using Balmer_H (B_H)...
  6. A

    Question re: Deuterium Emission Spectrum

    So, the next question, assuming I have calculated correctly above, is this: How does one work into the equations the refractive index of air? Does one. for instance, simply divide wavelength by ~1.00029 to get observed values? e.g. 656.281 = H_alpha = 656.469 / 1.00028646 = 656.281. H-alpha...
  7. A

    Question re: Deuterium Emission Spectrum

    In response to Dr. Du's feedback, and on the basis of CODATA 2010 values... 9.10938291*10^-31 kg: electron mass 1.672621777*10^-27 kg: proton mass 1.674927351*10^-27 kg: neutron mass 1.0973731568539 * 10^7 m^-1: Rydberg Constant ... here is what I calculate to be the first five lines in the...
  8. A

    Question re: Deuterium Emission Spectrum

    Deuterium Spectrum (nm) 410.07, 433.93, 486.01, 656.11 I came upon these figures on a commercial product site for Deuterium lamps. So, question: Are they correct? If so, then... 364.5068222*(3^2/(3^2 - 4)) = 656.11 364.5068222*(4^2/(4^2 - 4)) = 486.01 364.5068222*(5^2/(5^2 - 4)) = 433.93...
  9. A

    Mass of Electron: 9.10938291x10-31 kg

    I realize this topic is a bit dated, but still worth a quick follow-up... Well... no, actually. As Khashishi noted, the 4 and 0 relate to standard uncertainty and are associated with the last two digits 9, 1, meaning that the value for electron mass is probably 9.10938291*10^-31 kg, plus or...
  10. A

    Proof of ∏(√n) Increment for Centered Polygonal Numbers w/ Prime Index

    I'm not sure what you mean by "analogous to polygonal numbers." Oblong numbers map 1:1 to triangular numbers (= 2 times a triangular number) and triangular numbers are one kind of polygonal number, but Polygonal numbers in general? It's true that the polygonal numbers can be constructed from...
  11. A

    An issue with the vector model of spin and its operators

    Can't say as I understand your Flash model, but it sure does look cool, Jeremy. Feel free to explain it a bit more. Also, since you mentioned spin 5/2... ... here is a purely numerological observation that may or may not be of interest to you in relation to Stan Sykora's comments here at...
  12. A

    An odd coincidence or just nothing?

    I'm not a physicist, Jack, but you might want to familiarize yourself with the Lorentz Factor at the very least. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_factor If you want to know more, maybe post a topic in the General Physics section of the site. I'd gander that folks who can explain it far...
  13. A

    An odd coincidence or just nothing?

    Sorry to burst your bubble, Jack, but all you've discovered is that 86400/299792458 is close to .0003 - AC
  14. A

    Is There a Predictable Pattern in Prime Exponent Series Gaps?

    Mandelbra, Unfortunately, I have no paper to link to, and by no means is that failing for a lack of searching; but here's a little example of what I mean from the 29th row of the Eulerian Triangle (data courtesy of OEIS). Check any of these values modulo 29 and you'll get the same answer: 1...
  15. A

    Conjecture regarding perfect numbers.

    FWIW, all Mersenne Prime Exponents > 3 are congruent to 1, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19 or 23 (mod 24), which happens to be the automorphism group for 24 (8 total self-mappings). This follows from the fact that all Mersenne Prime exponents are prime and therefore follow the form n = 6x +/- 1 for n >3. - AC
Back
Top