Recent content by Ken Gallock
-
Graduate QED: redshifting light and infrared divergence
I was thinking about the theoretical upper limit. So, you mean that even a very long wavelength, such as an infinitely long one, can be detected in principle?- Ken Gallock
- Post #7
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
Graduate QED: redshifting light and infrared divergence
Yes, that is what I meant. Sorry. For example, we can use a device like a laser; The wavelength of the light can be changed as we turn a dial of the device. By doing so, the wavelength of the light can be changed (I assume nothing affects the wavelength while the light propagates). Could you...- Ken Gallock
- Post #5
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
Graduate QED: redshifting light and infrared divergence
Thanks for your reply. So, I think I should know about more basic concepts. Let me ask the following: The situation is that there is a light source in flat spacetime which emits a light of wavelength ##\lambda##. And an observer, who detects the light, is in the same frame of reference of the...- Ken Gallock
- Post #3
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
Graduate QED: redshifting light and infrared divergence
I am looking for some resources describing the following content: A light with wavelength ##\lambda## is propagating in flat spacetime. The light redshifts as its wavelength gets larger and larger. In quantum field theory, this causes an infrared divergence of the field. What I want to know...- Ken Gallock
- Thread
- Divergence Infrared Light Qed Quantum field theory Redshift Renormalization
- Replies: 7
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
Undergrad Gaussian normal coordinates and Riemann normal coordinates
(finally, I figured out the password of PF...) Thank you for your reply. It is very helpful.- Ken Gallock
- Post #8
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
Undergrad Gaussian normal coordinates and Riemann normal coordinates
Hi. I was wondering what is the relationship between Gaussian normal coordinates and Riemann normal coordinates. Thanks.- Ken Gallock
- Thread
- Coordinates Gaussian Normal Riemann
- Replies: 7
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
Undergrad Covariance Matrices and Standard form
Hi. I have a question about covariance matrices (CMs) and a standard form. In Ref. [Inseparability Criterion for Continuous Variable Systems], it is mentioned that CMs ##M## for two-mode Gaussian states can be symplectic transformed to the standard form ##M_s##: ## M= \left[ \begin{array}{cc}...- Ken Gallock
- Thread
- Covariance Covariance matrix Form Matrices Standard
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
Undergrad Wick's theorem and Nucleon scattering
Sorry for my late reply. Somehow I didn't get the notification. :( Your reply helped me a lot. I did calculation as follows: \begin{align} &\langle f|: \psi^\dagger(x_1)\psi(x_1)\psi^\dagger(x_2)\psi(x_2) :|i\rangle \notag \\ &=\langle f| \psi^\dagger(x_1)\psi^\dagger(x_2)\psi(x_1)\psi(x_2)...- Ken Gallock
- Post #3
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
Undergrad Wick's theorem and Nucleon scattering
Hi. My question is about nucleon-nucleon scattering. In David Tong's lecture note, he discusses Wick's theorem and nucleon scattering (page 58-60). My problem is that I don't know how to calculate the second line of eq(3.48): \begin{equation} <p'_1, p'_2|:\psi^\dagger (x_1) \psi (x_1)...- Ken Gallock
- Thread
- Nucleon Qft Scattering Scattering amplitudes Theorem Wick's theorem
- Replies: 3
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
Clifford algebra in higher dimensions
Thanks. I will do my best.- Ken Gallock
- Post #5
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
Clifford algebra in higher dimensions
I think I should have noted the motivation of this problem. We want to think about a generalization of 4D Clifford algebra. For example, in ##1+3## dimension, we can set ##\Gamma##s as \begin{align} \Gamma^{0\pm}:=\dfrac12 (\gamma^0 \pm \gamma^1),\\ \Gamma^{1\pm}:=\dfrac12 (i\gamma^2 \pm...- Ken Gallock
- Post #3
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
Clifford algebra in higher dimensions
Homework Statement Consider gamma matrices ##\gamma^0, \gamma^1, \gamma^2, \gamma^3## in 4-dimension. These gamma matrices satisfy the anti-commutation relation $$ \{ \gamma^\mu , \gamma^\nu \}=2\eta^{\mu \nu}.~~~(\eta^{\mu\nu}=diag(+1,-1,-1,-1)) $$ Define ##\Gamma^{0\pm}, \Gamma^{1\pm}## as...- Ken Gallock
- Thread
- Algebra Clifford algebra Dimensions Gamma matrices Higher dimensions Susy
- Replies: 4
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
Undergrad Lorentz transformation and its Noether current
Thanks! I got the same result!- Ken Gallock
- Post #7
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
Undergrad Lorentz transformation and its Noether current
Is it different when I'm dealing with spinor fields?- Ken Gallock
- Post #5
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
Undergrad Lorentz transformation and its Noether current
I want eq(1.53): $$ \delta \mathcal{L}=-\omega^\mu_{~\nu}x^\nu\partial_\mu \mathcal{L}. $$- Ken Gallock
- Post #3
- Forum: Quantum Physics