In Schutz's treatment of general relativity he defines a one-form as a function which maps a vector to a real number, and then later defines a vector as a linear function that maps one-forms into the reals. So the definitions seem to be circular - is there another way we can define a vector?
Are the following three equivalent?
P_{\alpha}A^{\beta}\tilde{\omega}^{\beta}(\vec{e_{\beta}} ) = \sum_{\alpha = 0}^{3}{P_{\alpha}\tilde{\omega}^{\alpha}(\sum_{\beta = 0}^{3}{A^{\beta}\vec{e}_{\beta}) = \sum_{\alpha = 0}^{3}{P_{\alpha}A^{\alpha}
I'm having trouble understanding the following sentence from Schutz's A First Course in General Relativity, so I was hoping someone could explain/expound on it. "
p_a \equiv \widetilde{p}( \vec{e_{\alpha} ) } ) Any component with a single lower index is, by convention, the component of a...
Suppose you have an question like:
"In the t-x spacetime diagram of O, draw the basis vectors \vec{e}_0 and \vec{e}_1 Draw the corresponding basis vectors of \bar{O} , who moves with speed 0.6 in the positive x direction relative to O. Draw the corresponding basis vectors of...
I'm not sure I understand how:
T^{\alpha \mu \lambda}A_{\mu}C_{\lambda}^{\gamma} = D^{\gamma \alpha}
"Represents 16 different equations..."
My thinking was that \alpha and \gamma each have four possible values \left\{0,...3 \right\} so we have 4 \cdot 4 = 16 different...
I thought that when you used a roman letter such as v that you started at 1 instead of 0. For instance if you had:
A^v C_{\mu v}
Wouldn't that just be: A^1C_{\mu 1} + A^2C_{\mu 2} + A^3C_{\mu 3} ?
(this is one of the problems with a solution from Schutz's book and the solution starts...
From Schutz's A First Course in General Relativity
"A particle of rest mass m moves with velocity v in the x direction of frame O. What are the components of the four-velocity and four-momentum?"
By definition \vec{U} = \vec{e}_{\bar{0}
However, I don't see how he gets U^{\alpha} =...
Okay, thanks, I'm pretty sure I understand this now. However, I'm probably going to have more questions as I continue through Schutz's treatment of the spacetime interval. Should I post them here, or make a new thread?
I have been working through Schutz's A First Course in General Relativity and was a little confused by how he presents the space time interval:
\Delta \overline{s}^2 = \sum_{\alpha = 0}^{3} \sum_{\beta = 0}^{3} M_{\alpha \beta} (\Delta x^{\alpha})(\Delta x^{\beta}) for some...