I Emission probability in blackbody spectrum derivation

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Swamp Thing
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of emission probability in the context of blackbody spectrum derivation. There is a clarification that the emission probability, denoted as p, is not a probability density but rather a straightforward probability indicating whether emission has occurred. The presenter does not explicitly state this distinction, leading to some confusion. Understanding this difference is crucial for accurately interpreting the blackbody spectrum. Overall, the emphasis is on correctly defining the nature of the emission probability in this context.
Physics news on Phys.org
No, ##p## is not probability density. It's just the probability that emission happened.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes bhobba and Swamp Thing
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...