How to Determine the Displacement of a Stretched String?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tigger88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    String Wave
AI Thread Summary
To determine the displacement of a stretched string, the initial conditions are given by y(x,0) = sin(3(pi)x/L) and y'(x,0) = (3pi/L)sqrt(T/rho)sin(3(pi)x/L). The challenge lies in finding the general form of the displacement y for all x and t, with attempts made using various wave equations. The user struggles with incorporating sine and cosine terms correctly, as their trials with y = sin(kx)cos(wt) and y = sin(kx-wt) yield incorrect results. A suggested approach includes considering both sine and cosine terms in the general solution, such as y = sin(kx)[A sin(wt) + B cos(wt)], or using a phase shift. The discussion emphasizes the need for a proper combination of these terms to satisfy the initial conditions.
tigger88
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A stretched string has length L and is attaached to a rigid support at either end. The string displacement from equilibrium at t=0 is given by:
y(x,0) = sin(3(pi)x/L)

and the velocity of the string is:

y'(x,0) = (3pi/L)sqrt(T/rho)sin(3(pi)x/L)
where T = tension in the string, and rho = its mass per unit length
and sqrt(T/rho) is the wave velocity of transverse waves on the string.

Give the form of the displacement y for all x, t.

Homework Equations



(This is kind of where I'm stuck). I assumed the general equation of a wave was y = sin(kx)cos(wt), but that didn't work.
I then tried with y = sin(kx-wt), but that also didn't seem to work.

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to use the general equation for a wave, differentiate it wrt t, plug in t=0 and compare it to the given velocity equation, but whenever I try I end up with a cos term instead of sine. I really can't figure out how it's a sine term in both the displacement and velocity.

If I used y = sin(kx)sin(wt), then at t=0, y=0.
And if I used y = sin(kx)cos(wt), then dy/dt = -wsin(kx)sin(wt), and at t=0, dy/dt = 0.
If I used y = sin(kx-wt), then dy/dt = wcos(kx-wt), which doesn't have the necessary sine term.

Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should take as your general solutions both sine an cosine terms:
y= sin(kx)[A sin(wt) +B cos(wt)] terms. Or equivalently work with a phase shift sin(kx)sin(wt+p).
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top