Combined cycle gas turbines (solar and natural gas)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the feasibility of using combined cycle gas turbines with natural gas and solar troughs for energy generation in Broome, Australia. The process involves concentrating solar power (CSP) to heat a fluid that generates steam, which drives a turbine connected to a generator, with questions raised about explaining this in terms of Faraday's Law. Additionally, the natural gas combustion produces heat and steam for further turbine operation. The conversation also touches on the costs associated with CNG carriers, building combined cycle power stations, and parabolic troughs, highlighting the complexity and investment required for combined cycle systems. Overall, the integration of solar and gas technologies aims to enhance efficiency while addressing greenhouse gas emissions.
Lumique
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Not sure if I've posted it on the correct thread but I don't think this classifies as advanced physics!
I'm currently doing a physics assignment where we have to choose an energy source for a town in Australia (Broome).
I am choosing to use a combined cycle gas turbine with natural gas as the main source and solar troughs to partially mitigate green house gases and make use of renewable energy sources around the place.

I am just wanting to ask and confirm whether my physics is right...
So using CSP, the reflective surfaces focus the sunlight on a focal point where there is heating oil (or another substance) which heats up and is transferred to heat water into steam and that steam drives a turbine. The turbine is then connected to a generator which is a coiled wire that is spinning in a magnetic field which induces a current (here's where I get confused). Is there any other way of saying that in terms of Faraday's Law? And what then happens with the transformer?

At the same time, the natural gas is mixed with air and ignited to produce CO2, H2O and heat and that is pressurised to spin the turbine and the heat from those hot gases are used to heat more water into steam.

Just a few random questions if anyone knows the answer.
-What is the approximate cost of a CNG carrier
-Cost of building a combined cycle power station
-Cost of parabolic troughs? I have not been able to find any sources to tell me the price!


Thank you if you can help in any way!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The turbine is then connected to a generator which is a coiled wire that is spinning in a magnetic field which induces a current (here's where I get confused). Is there any other way of saying that in terms of Faraday's Law? And what then happens with the transformer?

Usually a generator is a spinning magnet whose magnetic field cuts through stationary coils of wire, generating an electric current.

The electric potential (voltage) of the generator is relatively low and therefore impractical for long transmission lines. A transformer steps up the voltage for efficient transmission.
 
Combined cycle usually refers to a gas turbine (or diesel) generator with a waste heat recovery unit (WHRU) or exhaust gas boiler in the flue, the heat recovered from the exhaust gas is turned into steam, to drive a steam turbine and increase the overall efficiency of the plant. The big problem with combined cycle is that you have to make a large investment in plant for a relatively small gain in efficiency, what you propose to do is introduce another layer of complexity for an even smaller gain.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top