QM Newbie: What Does 'Non-Degenerate Spectrum of Boundstates' Mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter c299792458
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean Qm Spectrum
c299792458
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am new to QM, so advanced apologies for the dumb questions to follow. What does "the spectrum of boundstates is non-degenerate" mean? And why is the time-independent Schrodinger eqn reflection invariant? (I'm not sure I quite know what that means either...)

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Degenerate" energy states are ones which have the same energy. So "the spectrum of bound states is non-degenerate" means no two bound states have the same energy.
(This is specific to your system though, and not true in general)
A reflection is a transformation of coordinates x -> -x. So it means that the equation gives the same solutions if you invert the coordinate system.
(which may also include the _time_ coordinate, since it's time-independent, changing the sign of the time coordinate will by definition not change anything.)
 
Thanks, alxm!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Back
Top