Calculating angle of a rotation for a line

AI Thread Summary
To rotate a line to align with the positive x-direction, the angle of rotation, theta, can be determined using the slope (m) from the line's equation y = mx + c. The correct theta can be identified based on the quadrant of the line, with options being -theta or -(pi + theta). Using the two-argument form of the arc tangent function, atan2(y, x), simplifies this process by automatically providing the correct angle based on the coordinates. Additionally, it is possible to perform the rotation without calculating the angle explicitly, which can streamline the process when dealing with multiple lines in MATLAB. This approach ensures that the line segments are accurately positioned along the positive x-axis.
nancy189
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys,

I want to rotate a line so that it lies on the positive x direction. I can determine the equation of the line as y=m*x+c where m is the slope and c is the intercept. The angle of rotation, theta is known by tan inverse of m. Now theta can be either -theta or -(pi+theta) depending on the quadrant in which the line lies.

How can I know which of these thetas i should use directly by looking at the equation of the line. I need to rotate about 400 lines so manually looking at each line can be time intensive. I can use an if else loop in my code to do it automatically.

Thanks.
Nancy
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do you mean a line, or a ray? If you're dealing with a line, then rotating by -theta-pi produces exactly the same result as rotating by -theta. It's only if you're dealing with a ray (or, say, rotating a line segment about one end) that the ambiguity you mention becomes significant.

Every floating point library I know of has a two-argument form of the arc tangent function, arctan(x,y) or ArcTan(x,y) or atan2(x,y), that finds the angle whose tangent is y/x. This two-argument form returns the theta that is right for the quadrant of (x,y), and also deals correctly with the x=0 case (although I gather that's not a problem for you).

You can also do the rotation directly, without ever explicitly calculating the angle. This is the most efficient way.
 
Hi pmsrw3,

Yes I am rotating a line about one point. I translate all the line segments that I am studying to the origin. I want to rotate all the lines so that they fall on the positive X axis. I am using MATLAB. So I need to determine the correct angle for rotation, if not I get segments on the positive and negative axis.
 
If I understand you right, this is much simpler than you think. If you have a line segment from (0,0) to (x,y) and you rotate it about the (0,0) end so that it's horizontal, you will always end up with (l,0) as the new distal endpoint, where l=\sqrt{x^2+y^2} is the length of the line segment. There's no need to compute the angle of rotation at all.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top