Wind chill: how to calculate? Is there such thing as wind warmth ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pa5tabear
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wind
AI Thread Summary
Wind chill is primarily a factor in cold weather, where it describes the cooling effect of wind on dry skin, influenced by wind speed and evaporative cooling. In hot conditions, wind can feel warm if the air temperature is higher than skin temperature, but this effect is limited by sweating and humidity levels. The concept of "wind warmth" is analogous to the heating effect in a convection oven, where warm air circulates. Wet Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT) is a more relevant measure for hot weather, accounting for humidity and sunlight effects on perceived temperature. Overall, while wind can provide warmth, its cooling effects dominate in cold conditions, and the terminology differs significantly between hot and cold environments.
pa5tabear
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
Wind chill: how to calculate? Is there such thing as wind "warmth"?

If it is really hot outside, and the air were warmer than your skin, would you feel warmer when it blows on you? Would there still be some sort of chilling effecT?

I'm guessing it's like basic convection. If the the fluid is warmer, the fluit will transfer heat to the body, and you will end up with some heating.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I think the coolness you feel is just not described by convection. Evaporation of water from your skin also plays a major role in the temperature you perceive of air around you. The loss of heat through evaporation and gain/loss due to conduction together decide whether wind is cool or warm. So in principle, yes, you can feel wind "warmth". But only if you are not sweating profusely at that moment.
 


Almost. Because of evaporation, our bodies' ability to cool itself comes largely from sweat. So cooling amount is based on wind and wet bulb temperature. Wet bulb temp is based on dry bulb (normal) temp and humidity. There are no natural environments where wet bulb temp is high enough to cause a "wind heating" effect, so such a term does not exist. Even on a 110F day in Phoenix, your body can still cool itself -- better than on a 95F day in Philadelphia.
 
Last edited:


But 'wind chill' doesn't only refer to evaporative cooling, surely(?). It must also involve wind speed (forced convection effects) against a dry clothed body.
Isn't it "wind warmth" inside a fan oven?
 


Wind chill doesn't include evaporative cooling at all...or clothes, for that matter. Wind chill is defined only for cold weather, when your skin is essentially dry. The nearest analogue for hot weather is Wet Bulb Globe Temperature (not the same as wet bulb temperature), which uses a formula to estimate the effects of ambient sunlight and wind on a wet bulb (you, in a sweaty tshirt) on a hot day.

Yes, wind heating is what happens in a convection oven.

Fyi, wind chill and WBGT both have good wiki pages.
 


Also, "heat index" (is one I don't like because it is purely subjective) tries to equate what it feels like on a dry vs a humid day.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top