Efficiently calculating the magnitude of gravitational force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the gravitational force between a uniform thin spherical shell and a particle using integration techniques. The shell is divided into narrow rings to simplify the calculations, with specific formulas provided for volume and mass. The integration process involves using angles and distances to derive the force exerted by the shell on the particle. While some participants suggest using Gauss's law and symmetry for a more efficient solution, others emphasize the necessity of calculus and the effectiveness of the ring integration method. Ultimately, the consensus is that while there may be alternative approaches, the integration method is straightforward and relies heavily on symmetry.
Richard Nash
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am reading Kolenkow and Kleppner's Classical Mechanics and they have tried to calculate the gravitational force between a uniform thin spherical shell of mass M and a particle of mass m located at a distance r from the center.


The shell has been divided into narrow rings.R has been assumed to be the radius of the shell with thickness t (t<<R). The ring at angle \theta which subtends angle d\theta has circumference 2\pi R\sin\theta.The volume is $$dV=2\pi R^2t\sin \theta d\theta$$ and its mass is $$pdV=2\pi R^2t\rho\sin\theta d\theta$$

If \alpha be the angle between the force vector and the line of centers, dF=\frac{Gm\rho dV}{r'^2}\cos\alpha where r' is the distance of each part of the ring from m.

Next, an integration has been carried out using $$\cos\alpha=\frac{r-R\cos\theta}{r'}$$ and $$r'=\sqrt{r'^2+R^2-2\pi R\cos\theta}$$

Question: I would like to avoid these calculations and I was wondering if there exists a better solution.
 
Science news on Phys.org
You can use Gauß' law and symmetry. But if you want to calculate it via an integral, I don't think there is an easier way.
 
Richard Nash said:
Question: I would like to avoid these calculations and I was wondering if there exists a better solution.
Welcome to PF!

You certainly need to use calculus. When one does this kind of calculus problem one has to use as much symmetry as possible. It seems that is achieved by dividing the sphere into rings perpendicular to the axis through the centre of the sphere and the point mass, calculating the gravity from a ring and integrating from one end to the other. If that is what they are doing, that is as simple as it gets.

AM
 
Thread 'Simple math model for a Particle Image Velocimetry system'
Hello togehter, I am new to this forum and hope this post followed all the guidelines here (I tried to summarized my issue as clean as possible, two pictures are attached). I would appreciate every help: I am doing research on a Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) system. For this I want to set a simple math model for the system. I hope you can help me out. Regarding this I have 2 main Questions. 1. I am trying to find a math model which is describing what is happening in a simple Particle...
I would like to use a pentaprism with some amount of magnification. The pentaprism will be used to reflect a real image at 90 degrees angle but I also want the reflected image to appear larger. The distance between the prism and the real image is about 70cm. The pentaprism has two reflecting sides (surfaces) with mirrored coating and two refracting sides. I understand that one of the four sides needs to be curved (spherical curvature) to achieve the magnification effect. But which of the...
Back
Top