Second order expansion of metric in free-fall

InsertName
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have read that, in a freely-falling frame, the metric/ interval will be of the form:

ds2 = -c2dt2(1 + R0i0jxixj) - 2cdtdxi(\frac{2}{3} R0jikxjxk) + (dxidxjij - \frac{1}{3} Rikjlxkxl)

to second order.

Does anyone know where I could find a derivation of this result?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
InsertName, That's an interesting formula! It's derivation is almost immediate, except I have doubts about the absence of the time coordinate, and the factors of 1/3.

Expand the metric in a Taylor's series:
gμν = Aμν + Bμνσxσ + Cμσντxσxτ + ...
It's always possible to choose coordinates such that Aμν = ημν and Bμνσ = 0, and in these coordinates the Christoffel symbols vanish. Then the formula for the Riemann tensor reduces to
Rμσντ = ½(gμτ,σν + gσν,μτ - gμν,στ - gστ,μν) = Cμστν + Cτνμσ - Cμσντ - Cσμτν.
If you assume C to have the same symmetry as the Riemann tensor, then this is 4Cμστν, showing that Cμστν = (1/4)Rμσντ
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top