Astronomy in West LA: Can You Observe with a Telescope?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Quaoar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Astronomy
AI Thread Summary
Observing with a telescope in West Los Angeles is challenging due to significant light pollution, limiting visibility primarily to bright celestial objects like the Moon and major planets. While telescopes can penetrate some light pollution and reveal star clusters, nebulae and galaxies are harder to observe. For serious stargazing, traveling to darker locations such as Lancaster or Palmdale is recommended. Light pollution filters can enhance viewing by reducing specific wavelengths of light, but their effectiveness varies depending on the type of filter used. Ultimately, the best results come from observing in darker skies rather than relying solely on filters.
Quaoar
Messages
184
Reaction score
0
Question: I live in west Los Angeles, and I was wondering if I would be able to see much at all with a personal telescope, if I got one. I imagine the light pollution would prevent me from observing anything but the brightest of objects (Moon, Venus, Polaris, etc). Has anyone attempting to do some serious observing in a place with a lot of light pollution?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It isn't great where I live (15 miles west of Philadelphia), but I don't know how it compares to where you are - can you identify what the dimmest stars you can see are? Anyway, telescopes are surprisingly able to burn through the skyglow and see dim objects. The 5 bright planets are, of course, a given, but you can also see pretty much all major star clusters. Nebulae and galaxies are a little tougher.

For me, it is worth it to drive an hour and a half every now and then to use my telescope somewhere much darker.
 
It's pretty crappy in West LA. Your best bet is to head out towards Lancaster or Palmdale for anything other than the brightest stars.
 
You might want to consider one of the many light pollution filters on the market. The narrowband filters are good at removing individual components of light pollution, like high-pressure sodium light. The broadband filters are more aggressive -- killing more of the light from the objects you're trying to view -- but can really help out a lot in extremely light polluted skies.

There really is no comparison to just driving out to a dark site, however.

- Warren
 
More specifically, many nebulae emit light at very specific frequencies (like Hydrogen Alpha) and a broadband filter that allows only those frequencies in can be very effective (so I've heard - I haven't done much work wih them yet...). But it won't help much for galaxies.
 
H-alpha and Oxygen-III line filters are very effective for certain kinds of objects, but they are not intended for use as "light pollution filters." A light pollution filter is not a line filter -- it's essentially an all-pass filter with a few carefully chosen notches to reject e.g. sodium-vapor light from commercial lighting systems.

- Warren
 
3I/ATLAS, also known as C/2025 N1 (ATLAS) and formerly designated as A11pl3Z, is an iinterstellar comet. It was discovered by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) station at Río Hurtado, Chile on 1 July 2025. Note: it was mentioned (as A11pl3Z) by DaveE in a new member's introductory thread. https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/brian-cox-lead-me-here.1081670/post-7274146 https://earthsky.org/space/new-interstellar-object-candidate-heading-toward-the-sun-a11pl3z/ One...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
6K
Back
Top