Stargazing First is the Blue Snowball , a planetary nebula.

  • Thread starter Thread starter russ_watters
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nebula Planetary
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the user's astrophotography experiences, starting with the "Blue Snowball" planetary nebula, which required only 30-second exposures for bright results. The user also attempted capturing the Crab Nebula and Saturn, noting the challenges of atmospheric turbulence affecting Saturn's image quality. They recently acquired autoguiding hardware, which they plan to use to improve their imaging results. After cleaning their CCD, they achieved a significant improvement in capturing Saturn, attributing previous issues to local seeing conditions rather than equipment problems. The user is actively processing their images and has updated their website to showcase their work.
Messages
23,694
Reaction score
11,133
First is the "Blue Snowball", a planetary nebula.

I took three pictures tonight.

First is the "Blue Snowball", a planetary nebula. This one is really bright and 30 second exposures are all that is really needed. The only stretching that was done was to cut off the black level at the bottom.

Next is the Crab Nebula. Decent for my first attempt, with 30 and 45 second sub-exposures. There is a ton of subtle detail to bring out with much longer exposures.

Last is Saturn. I've taken a bunch, and frankly, I've been a little disappointed so far. I'm matching, but have not yet exceeded the quality I got from my older, much smaller telescope. I think it is mostly due to the atmospheric turbulence around here.

I've gotten the hardware I need to start autoguiding, so I should be able to start figuring that out soon (tomorrow...?) and up the quality of my another step.
 

Attachments

  • Snowball.jpg
    Snowball.jpg
    1.2 KB · Views: 514
  • Crab.jpg
    Crab.jpg
    15.9 KB · Views: 622
  • Saturn.jpg
    Saturn.jpg
    2.4 KB · Views: 590
Astronomy news on Phys.org
russ_watters said:
I've gotten the hardware I need to start autoguiding, so I should be able to start figuring that out soon (tomorrow...?) and up the quality of my another step.
Well, it took an extra month, but here's my first autoguided pic. It's 15x2 minute red subs 15x3 minute blue and about 30x3 minute green subs. I intended to go to bed while shooting luminance frames, but fell asleep on the couch while it was shooting the greens.

I've got a very dirty CCD, which is surprising since I keep the camera in a zip-lock bag when not using it, but I cleaned it tonight and it looks better. Regardless, I've uncovered a bunch of learning curve issues to deal with. Still, it's a pretty good result. Compare it to my image in post 125: https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=7011&d=1148840740
 

Attachments

  • m51-rgb.jpg
    m51-rgb.jpg
    16.6 KB · Views: 607
I finally got a good night of seeing for imaging Saturn. Attached is the result - by far my best yet.

I'd actually been starting to wonder if I was doing something wrong or if there was something wrong with my scope, but nope - it looks like it is all about the seeing where I live. I did take more exposures than usual (1000 vs about 3000) and I did the color correction in Registax and I think it looks more natural than in some of my others.

This is about 500 of 1000, stacked in Registax 4, single point alignment (can't seem to get multipoint to work...), .25sec exposures, 5x powermate, bmp format, taken with my DSI-Color.

I'm not finished processing yet, but this is probably 95% of what I'll get out of it (at 3:00 in the morning...). I also took a few avis with my QuickCam VC, so we'll see if they yield anything...

Btw, I have finally updated my website...
 

Attachments

  • Saturn-5x-025.jpg
    Saturn-5x-025.jpg
    5.8 KB · Views: 593
Last edited:
Very nice, Russ!
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
6K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top