Lorentz transformation and lorentz-Einstein transformations

bernhard.rothenstein
Messages
991
Reaction score
1
I find in the literature of the subject:
Lorentz transformations and Lorentz-Einstein transformations. The use of one or of the other could lead to a difference in interpretation?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bernhard.rothenstein said:
I find in the literature of the subject:
Lorentz transformations and Lorentz-Einstein transformations. The use of one or of the other could lead to a difference in interpretation?
Thanks
I think most people loosely use them interchangeably.
In strict terms, saying simply LT is a misnomer (even though we all use it).
Lorentz meant a real physical change in the matter in order to avoid SR.
The L-ET is a change in the coordinate system in order to leave the matter unchanged, which is SR. I confess to still saying LT when I mean L-ET.
It's sort of like saying "I weigh 80 kilograms."
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top