Frequency reponse of shock absorber piston in F1 car

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the maximum frequency of a shock absorber piston in a Formula 1 car, particularly during high-speed conditions. Participants emphasize that the piston will oscillate when the car encounters bumps, but ideally, a well-designed shock absorber should fully dampen movement by the time the suspension returns to its neutral position. The frequency of oscillation is influenced by factors like spring constant and unsprung weight, with some suggesting that the maximum frequency could be around 50Hz. There is debate over the definition of oscillation, with some arguing that any movement while driving straight is not oscillation but rather a response to road conditions. Ultimately, the frequency is context-dependent, varying with the car's speed and the surface being driven on.
LM741
Messages
130
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone!

This might be bit of the 'electrical engineering' topic - but maybe someone out there can help :)

Does anybody have any idea of what the maximum frequency of a piston in a shock absorber of a forumula 1 car is?
What do i mean: How many times does the piston (in a shock absorber) move up and down, past the reference point, in one second. The reference point is defined as the point where the piston sits when the car is stationery. I ave googled this tones of times wih no luck - I've emailed "f1 experts" but without any reply - if anyone knows of some expert ( or someone that would know such info.) could perhaps ask..please! oh yes - all i need is the maximum freuency - which would probably occur during full speed.

Please if anyone can give me some idea. I would guess about 50Hz.

Thanks guys
John Criticos
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
A shock adsorber is designed to prevent any oscillation.
Many designs are non linear was well as being non symmetrical.

The idea, if the suspension is properly designed is to fully disapate all the stored energy of the spring by the time the suspension returns to the normal curb height position.
If it oscilates at all it's defective or not proper for the rest of the suspension.

I suspect what you want is the one shot travel time from some compressed position back to the neutral position.
If you know the spring constant and unsprung weight you can probably get a ball park figure.
Non linear damping will lower the time though.
The shortest time allowed is how fast the spring can move the wheel back to the neutral position with no damping.

Also if you are moving the car back up as opposed to pushing the wheel back down the mass will be different.

Chances are that someone who might know would consider their suspension tuning a deep dark secret.

Best I can do.
 
"If it oscilates at all it's defective or not proper for the rest of the suspension."
NoTime>> i couldn't disagree with you more. Whilst the car is in motion - the piston is going to move up and down! Hence the oscillations. It will oscillate! The quality of the shock absorber just determines the degree to which the piston will oscillate. But the statement pf yours, quoted above, is totally incorrect - at least i think so.
Thanks, anyway.
 
Oscillation implies continued movement without additional energy input.
An ideal shock adsober will fully damp any movement of the suspension by the time the suspension returns to the neutral position.

While the car is on a flat road, moving at a stright line at constant speed the suspension (and the shock piston) should not move at all.

The shock is a damper designed to adsorb energy.
Of course the shock piston will move if you hit bumps or potholes, but that's quite different from oscillation.
A car with shocks that allow oscillation is dangerous.
 
As an aside, almost all cars are underdamped. Typical street cars have damping ratios of ~0.2-0.4 (though the dampers are nonlinear, so this isn't completely well-defined). Any more than that gets extremely uncomfortable.

Anyway, I don't understand the original question. The answer depends completely on what the car's doing and the surface it's being driven over. Are you asking about the resonant frequencies of the chassis? The amount of damping? The highest frequencies that are important to control? For the last question, I think that the you'll get your answer by looking at the rumble strips.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top