Why Does Coulomb's Unit Measurement Include Seconds?

AI Thread Summary
A coulomb is defined as the total charge carried by a current of one Ampere over one second, leading to its unit being Amperes seconds rather than Amperes per second. The mathematical relationship I = dQ/dt shows that charge (Q) is the integral of current (I) over time (t), resulting in units of Amperes multiplied by seconds. This distinction emphasizes that a coulomb represents a total amount of charge, not a rate, similar to how energy is defined as power multiplied by time. Therefore, after two seconds, the total charge would be two coulombs. Understanding this difference clarifies the unit measurement of coulombs.
ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1
If a coulumb is defined as the amount of charge carried by a current of one Ampere in a second, why is its units Amperes seconds and not Amperes per seconds?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I=\frac{dQ}{dt} by definition and so Q = \int I\;dt which has a unit of (amperes x seconds)
seems obvious to me, do I understand your question correctly?
 
Yes, I see how it works mathematically. But I just thought "the amount of charge carried by a current of one Ampere in a second" was similar to the amount of charge carried by a current of one Ampere per second" so it would have units of Amperes/S
 
No because a coulomb is a total amount of charge not a rate, so after 2 seconds you have 2 coulombs.
 
yeah, another example Energy = Power x time
and Energy is not a rate, while Power is. so amount of charge is like "energy" in this analogy
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top