Raising and lowering operators for spin

  • Thread starter Thread starter lion8172
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators Spin
lion8172
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
When we set the raising and lowering operators for spin to be S_{\pm} = S_x \pm i S_y, what convention are we following (i.e. why is the first term taken to be S_x and the second taken to be S_y)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If we label the eigenstates of S_z as |{+}\rangle and |{-}\rangle, so that S_z|{\pm}\rangle=\pm\frac12 |{\pm}\rangle, then
S_+|{-}\rangle=|{+}\rangle
S_-|{+}\rangle=|{-}\rangle
Also,
S_+|{+}\rangle=0
S_-|{-}\rangle=0
That is, S_+ raises the value of S_z, and S_- lowers it. That is how the raising and lowering operators are defined, and S_x \pm i S_y is just what they work out to be.
 
lion8172 said:
When we set the raising and lowering operators for spin to be S_{\pm} = S_x \pm i S_y, what convention are we following (i.e. why is the first term taken to be S_x and the second taken to be S_y)?

It is the right hand convention.
think about the angular momentum...
it is defined mathematically L=R x P... it is a "right handed representation".
We can of sure define that in left hand repr...
 
I think that is a Math method.
Example:
angular momentum: After "operate" with Math signals, Lz will be raised or lowered. (with operation L+=Lx+iLy)

--
If define L \pm = L_x \pm iL_y
When comute them:
[L_z ,L \pm ] = ... = \pm \hbar (L_x \pm iL_y )
(Griffiths D.J_Quantum Mechanics...)
If define "left hand" the signal will become to convert.
+- become -+
That is not good!
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top