How does the Gravitational Wave Rocket work?

CJames
Messages
367
Reaction score
1
Here's the paper I'm talking about

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/9702/9702005v1.pdf

It's times like this I wish I'd gone to class...

I've been trying to find a method of propulsion that falls within the realms of accepted physics but is convenient in terms of *storytelling*. I want my characters to reach star systems within subjective weeks, which can't be done if you accelerate them at 1G (or anything remotely close to that).

The basic concept of the gravitational wave rocket is that it radiates gravitational waves asymmetrically, losing mass as it does so, causing it to accelerate. I would assume this would accelerate the rocket without generating any FELT acceleration, although I can't tell from the paper. I'm having a very difficult time understanding what is being discussed in this paper. At some points it says there is a vibration, at other times they say a rotation. I can't see what they are talking about. Even the meanings of most of the variables is completely beyond me. Can anybody help clarify this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that is something I'm not clear on at all. Do you "feel" your own gravitational radiation reaction or is it just a perturbation of your geodesic that you don't feel?


-Richard
 
Exactly. And furthermore, what sort of movement is taking place to generate this asymmetric gravitational radiation? I find the idea of using waves of gravity as reaction mass a very interesting concept. But I'm having trouble envisioning what is really happening. It can't just be two orbiting objects, can it?
 
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
Back
Top