A group G has exactly 8 elements or order 3

  • Thread starter Thread starter nowimpsbball
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements Group
AI Thread Summary
A group G has exactly 8 elements of order 3, leading to the question of how many subgroups of order 3 exist within G. The prime decomposition of 8 is 2^3, suggesting multiple ways to form factors, but clarification is needed on the interpretation of these factors in relation to subgroups. Each subgroup of order 3 contains elements of order 3, prompting inquiries about the number of such elements and the intersection of distinct subgroups. The discussion highlights the need for precise terminology regarding the elements and their orders in group theory. Understanding the structure of G is crucial for determining the number of subgroups of order 3.
nowimpsbball
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
A group G has exactly 8 elements of order 3 (Unanswered as of 1/31)

How many subgroups of order 3 does G have?

So we have 8 elements, its prime decomposition is 8=2^3. The number of different ways to get factors is how many subgroups, at least that is what I interpret from my notes...so there are 2^3, 2*2^2, and 2*2*2, so three different ways to get factors, am I doing this right?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do you mean G has 8 elements OR order 3, or do you mean G has 8 elements OF order 3.
 
d_leet said:
Do you mean G has 8 elements OR order 3, or do you mean G has 8 elements OF order 3.

g has 8 elements OF order 3, my bad
 
every subgroup of order three has how many elements of order three?

and how many common elements of order three do two distinct subgroups of order three have?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top