What Does the Curvature of Time Look Like in Our Perception?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Xeinstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curvature Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of time curvature in relation to our perception and its connection to the curvature of space, particularly within the framework of general relativity. Participants explore how we experience time and the implications of gravity on our perception of time versus space.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that our perception of time is linear and influenced by the functioning of our nervous system, leading to a chronological bias towards causality.
  • Others argue that objects in general relativity follow geodesics in spacetime, not just in space, and that the trajectory of a thrown ball does not solely represent the curvature of space.
  • A participant notes that the curvature of time cannot be isolated from the curvature of space, emphasizing the interconnectedness of the two concepts.
  • Some propose that the effects of curved time are more significant than those of curved space, citing examples such as the behavior of falling objects and the difference in clock rates at varying altitudes.
  • One participant challenges the idea that a parabolic path of a ball could represent a straight line in a curved space, suggesting that such a scenario would contradict established geometric principles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between the curvature of time and space, with no consensus reached on how to visualize or understand the curvature of time in relation to our experiences.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about the nature of spacetime and the effects of gravity, which remain unresolved. Participants reference specific examples and visualizations but do not agree on a unified interpretation.

Xeinstein
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
We can all see what curvature of space looks like, just by throwing a ball and watching it follow the natural geodesic.

But what does curvature of time look like?

How do we experience it?

We typically experience the passage of time in what seems to be a forward linear manner. The forward part seems to be due to how our nervous system works, thus giving a chronological bias towards causality in our perception.

But if we can see how gravity curves space, then how do we percieve how it affects time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Xeinstein said:
We can all see what curvature of space looks like, just by throwing a ball and watching it follow the natural geodesic.
Objects in GR don't generally follow geodesics in space, they follow geodesics in spacetime, usually the paths that minimize the proper time (although I gather it can maximize it in certain cases). I'm pretty sure a ball isn't following a geodesic in space when you throw it (unless you're in flat spacetime and the ball goes in a straight line).
 
Xeinstein said:
We can all see what curvature of space looks like, just by throwing a ball and watching it follow the natural geodesic.
Sorry, that is not the curvature of space.

If you throw a ball into the air and then someone throws you into the air as well, you'll see the ball moving in a straight line relative to yourself (in the absence of air resistance, of course).

At least, that's what happens at first. If both objects remain in free-fall long enough, eventually the ball will start to change course slightly (or speed up or slow down), due to the fact that the acceleration due to gravity is not constant everywhere. Now that's the curvature of space-time.

You can't isolate the curvature of time from the curvature of space.
 
Xeinstein said:
We can all see what curvature of space looks like, just by throwing a ball and watching it follow the natural geodesic.

No. The trajectory of the ball is mainly an effect of "curved time". Curved space produces only minor effects like orbit precession and additional light bending (doubling the amount caused by "curved time" alone). But note that "curved time" is not possible, without curved space, because you cannot have only one dimension of a manifold curved. So it's best to talk about curved spacetime.

Xeinstein said:
But what does curvature of time look like?
A nice visualization:
http://www.physics.ucla.edu/demoweb..._and_general_relativity/curved_spacetime.html
More visualization links:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1557122

Xeinstein said:
How do we experience it?
- Apples falling from trees.
- Clocks going faster on a mountain than in a valley.
 
To say it another way, if the curvature of the ball's path were representative of the curvature of space, then space would be mighty curved right there, and we'd have thrown out Euclidean Geometry centuries ago. In other words, if that parabolic path represented a straight line in that region of space, then there's no way the Pythagorean Theorem would hold in that region.

As others have said, the geodesic lies in the 4-d space-time surface (manifold).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K