Lit value for standard enthelpy change of formation for aqeuous HCl

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the standard enthalpy change of formation for solid Ammonium Chloride using four reactions. A key challenge is finding the literature value for the standard enthalpy change of formation for aqueous Hydrogen Chloride, as only the gaseous value is readily available. It is noted that the enthalpy change for the conversion from gaseous to aqueous HCl is -75140 J/mol, and reversing the sign provides the value for the opposite reaction. The participants clarify that this conversion is straightforward and based on established values. Overall, the focus is on obtaining accurate thermodynamic data for the lab experiment.
Barfolumu
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is not a problem, per se, because it is part of my Lab. We're calculating the standard enthalpy change of formation for solid Ammonium Chloride. To do this, we're using four separate rxns, and totaling their individual standard enthalpy change of formations. For two of these reactions we're using literature values, but I can not find the literature value for the standard enthalpy change of formation for aqueous Hydrogen Chloride online or in my book -- I can only find the lit value for gaseous Hydrogen Chloride. As far as I know, there is no way to convert one to the other, because these are determined experimentally, so I need to know the lit value for aqueous Hydrogen Chloride. Am I just missing something, or does anyone have a place where I can look this up?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Google and my textbook.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm doing this too and my lab manual says delta H for HCl (g)---> HCl (aq) = -75140 J/mol.

If you want it in the other direction, merely change the sign.
 
workerant said:
I'm doing this too and my lab manual says delta H for HCl (g)---> HCl (aq) = -75140 J/mol.

If you want it in the other direction, merely change the sign.

doh! of course. man, i feel sheepish now. thanks.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top