Question About Mass and Mass Flow Rate Relations

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between mass, mass flow rate, and the dynamics of a smaller sphere expanding within a larger, constant sphere. Participants explore the implications of this scenario on mass and density, considering both theoretical and practical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant defines mass as the product of density and volume, while mass flow rate is described as the product of density, velocity, and cross-sectional area.
  • Another participant assumes the larger sphere remains constant and proposes a derivative of mass with respect to time, suggesting a specific form for dM/dt.
  • A question is raised about whether mass is exiting the annular space or being compressed as the inner sphere expands, with implications for the rate of change of mass.
  • Further clarification is sought on the assumptions regarding the motion of the inner sphere, density uniformity, and the transport properties of the fluid in the annulus.
  • Participants discuss the need for initial conditions and the implications of various assumptions on the analysis, including the effects of compression waves and pressure gradients.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need for specific assumptions to analyze the problem effectively, but there is no consensus on the implications of the expanding inner sphere on mass flow and density. Multiple competing views on the nature of mass change and the assumptions required remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to initial conditions, assumptions about uniform density, and the need to consider thermodynamic properties, which are not fully resolved in the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring fluid dynamics, thermodynamics, and mathematical modeling in physics, particularly in contexts involving changing geometries and mass flow rates.

womfalcs3
Messages
60
Reaction score
5
Mass is the product of density and volume.

Mass flow rate is the product density, velocity, and cross-sectional area. (It's the derivative of mass with respect to time.)


Bare with the syntax please...

Looking at a sphere within a larger sphere, the volume of the difference is V=(4/3)*pi*(R^3-r^3) where R is a constant inner radius of the larger sphere. r is the radius of the smaller sphere, and it's not constant.

Multiplying that by density gives us the mass of the region in between the spheres.


Taking the derivative of that mass, however, with respect time, how would the equation look in relation to the description I gave above in the second line?

This isn't homework as I'm not in school anymore. It's a personal question.

It's a situation where the smaller sphere is increasing in radius as time is increased.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, since the bigger sphere is kept constant, as least that's what I am assuming from the start...

You leave the constants in front, including the R.

So. dM/dt = -4*pi*r^2*density
 
Out of curiosity, if the inner sphere is getting larger then is the mass exiting the annular space between the spheres or is the mass being compressed? Or does it matter...? dM/dt implies a rate of change of mass with respect to time. If mass is not exiting or entering the space between the spheres then dm/dt =0... Perhaps I've misunderstood the question.
 
To first reply, yes, the outer sphere is constant.

vector2 said:
Out of curiosity, if the inner sphere is getting larger then is the mass exiting the annular space between the spheres or is the mass being compressed? Or does it matter...? dM/dt implies a rate of change of mass with respect to time. If mass is not exiting or entering the space between the spheres then dm/dt =0... Perhaps I've misunderstood the question.

It matters. Adiabatic compression is taking place. Even though it matters, such effect will be taken into account once I have a rate equation in terms of mass.

The effect will reflect on density.
 
Problem statement: A spherical shell of radius r1, where: { r1 = f(t) ; i.e. r1 is a function of time} is enclosed inside a spherical shell of constant radius R. A fluid (e.g. gas, liquid) fills the region in between, with density rho. Assume f'(t) > 0 and compute the density rho, where: {rho = g(r,t) ; i.e. rho is a function of time and the radial distance from the origin}.

Is this correct? I started to derive this but I want to clarify a few assumptions first. If we really want to do this, we should do it right.

0.) What are the initial conditions? (initial density distributions, pressures, etc.)
1.) What is the rate of motion of the inner sphere? How fast does it move, and does it have an acceleration?
2.) Shall we assume the density in the spherical "annulus" is uniform? (I.e. the density is constant throughout the annulus.)
3.) The fluid in between has constant transport properties; no thermodynamic change in state.

Which assumptions would you like to consider? I don't think I could solve the problem without assumption (2). Also, I would need assumption (3), or else we would have to go into some thermodynamic analysis of the gas.

Remark 1: Note the assumption of (2) implies we need not consider compression wave effects.
Remark 2: Without assumption (3), the compression of the gas in the annulus causes a pressure gradient to develop inside the sphere pointing towards the center of the sphere; i.e. a force develops which tends to resist the encroachment of the inner sphere.

This should give us a more clear understanding.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K