Sine wave & reflection question?

AI Thread Summary
It is possible to manipulate a sine wave by adding another wave, but adding a cosine wave with a higher amplitude does not simply convert the sine wave into a cosine wave. Specifically, the equation sin(x) + 2cos(x) does not equal cos(x), as this would imply sin(x) = -cos(x), which is incorrect. For a clearer understanding of wave interactions and reflections, resources like HyperPhysics and PhET are recommended. The discussion emphasizes the need for precise amplitude adjustments to achieve desired wave transformations. Understanding these principles is crucial for studying wave behavior in physics.
shintashi
Messages
117
Reaction score
1
I seem to recall it is possible to change a wave's frequency, pattern, and amplitude by adding another wave to it.

Is it possible to add a second wave to a Sine wave to turn it into a cosine wave of the same amplitude and how would you do this? I'm thinking if I had an amplitude 1 for the sinewave, an amplitude 2 cosine wave would wipe out the sine wave and be reduced to a cosine wave. Is there a simpler way of doing this requiring less amplitude?

As a side note on waves, is there a good place/website to understand the physics behind reflection?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a question, not "learning materials" so I am moving this to "Introductory Physics".
 
So you think sin(x)+2cos(x) = cos(x)?

If this were true, then sin(x) = -cos(x) would also be true (which it isn't). What you're probably thinking of is the http://physics.tamuk.edu/~suson/html/4323/super.html.

I'm not sure what specifically you're looking for in regards to reflection (sound? light? mechanical waves?), but a couple of sites that have been handy for me are hyperphysics and PhET (I seem to recall a simulation or two involving waves/pulses on a string)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top