Solving Universal Gravity: Height of Chicago's Sears Tower

  • Thread starter Thread starter tnutty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Universal
AI Thread Summary
A gravimeter at the top of Chicago's Sears Tower measures gravity to be 0.00136 m/s² lower than at street level, prompting a calculation of the building's height. The discussion revolves around using gravitational equations, specifically F = GMm/(r²) and energy conservation principles, to derive the height. Participants clarify that only the radius of the Earth and the difference in gravitational acceleration are necessary for the calculation. The final result, after calculations, indicates that the height of the building is approximately 440 meters. The conversation emphasizes the importance of precision in calculations and understanding the variables involved.
tnutty
Messages
324
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A sensitive gravimeter is carried to the top of Chicago's Sears Tower, where its reading for the acceleration of gravity is 0.00136 m/s^2 lower than at street level.

Find the height of the building.

Homework Equations



F = GMm/(r^2)

and maybe

K + U = K_o + U_o

The Attempt at a Solution



don't know where to start!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
consider other units for m/s^2
 
Well I think I could use (g - 0.00136) = g_t.

I don't know how I could use this though.
 
wait could I do this :

(9.8 - 0.00136) = GMm/r^2 ?
 
Yes, so you can then write ...

g*r12 = G*M= (g - .00136)*r22
 
LowlyPion said:
Yes, so you can then write ...

g*r12 = G*M= (g - .00136)*r22


what happened to small m

(9.8 - 0.00136)(r^2) = GM (m?)
 
m*g*r12 = G*M*m= m*(g - .00136)*r22

If that makes you happier. It isn't a factor.

F = m*g = GM*m/r2

g = GM/r2
 
so,

let G_t = (9.8-0.00136);

then,

G_t*r^2 = GM

M = G_t*r^2 / G

and r is the radius of the Earth and G is the universal gravity constant.

m ~ 9.3579 * 10 ^ 17

But what does this mean? This is the mass of th building and...
 
In case you didn't notice you don't need G and you don't need M and you don't need m.

You just need re and g.

Building height will be Δr = r2 - r1

where r1 = re
 
  • #10
why is that?
 
  • #11
so

(9.8-0.00136) r^2 = GM

and GM is just dropped? why?
 
  • #12
tnutty said:
so

(9.8-0.00136) r^2 = GM

and GM is just dropped? why?

The answer is because you can.

g*r12 = (g - .00136)*r22

You just need re and g.

Building height will be Δr = r2 - r1

where r1 = re
 
  • #13
OK, i guess.

so

(9.8-0.00136) ( 6.37 * 10^6)^2 = R1;

R1 - R2 = height of tower

R1 ~ 3.976 * 10^14
R2 = (6.37 * 10^6)

right I got 6.37 * 10^6 as the radius of the Earth from my book.
 
  • #14
No.

Try being more careful.

(6378)2 km = 40678884

now multiply by 9.81/(9.81 - .00136) = ...

then take the square root. Then subtract one from the other. Keep as much precision as you can.

Your answer will be less than a km. Multiply by 1000 for meters.
 
  • #15
(6378)^2 = 40678884

ans * 9.81 / (9.81-0.00136) =
40684524.26

sqrt(ans) = 6378.44
??
 
  • #16
confused even more. Dont know where 6378 came from and why
sqrt ( ans * 9.81/(9.81-0.00136) )
...
...
 
  • #17
tnutty said:
confused even more. Dont know where 6378 came from and why
sqrt ( ans * 9.81/(9.81-0.00136) )
...
...

I used radius of Earth as 6378 km. And g you recognize as 9.81
sqrt(ans) = 6378.44
Right.

Now 6378.44 - 6378 = .44 km = 440 m = height of building.
 
  • #18
could you do it out in variables first so I can see what you have done.
Sorry.
 
  • #20
ok thanks
 
Back
Top