Momentum of electron from total energy of electron

AI Thread Summary
An electron with a total energy of 2.555 MeV, which is five times its rest energy, requires calculation of its momentum in MeV/c. The initial approach involved using the relativistic energy equation to find the velocity, but the method for deriving momentum was incorrect. Instead of dividing energy by velocity, the correct formula for relativistic momentum is momentum = (gamma) m v. By relating energy and momentum through the equation (v/c) = p c / E, the momentum can be directly calculated using the known values. This approach clarifies the relationship between energy, velocity, and momentum in relativistic physics.
umwolv16
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An electron has a total energy equal to five times its rest energy(0.511MeV).

--What is its momentum (in MeV/c)?


Homework Equations



E(total) = [mass(electron)*c^2]/[sq. root of (1- velocity^2/c^2)]
----I converted 2.555MeV (total energy) to 4.088e-13 J and plugged that in for E(total) to solve for velocity

The Attempt at a Solution



I used the EQN above to solve for velocity of the electron [in terms of c(speed of light)].
I then divided the total energy (2.555MeV) by this velocity (which I got to be 0.979680884c) and got the answer 2.61MeV/c. When I submit it, it says I'm within 10%, but I didn't round any numbers until the can't see what I did wrong...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
umwolv16 said:

Homework Statement



An electron has a total energy equal to five times its rest energy(0.511MeV).

--What is its momentum (in MeV/c)?


Homework Equations



E(total) = [mass(electron)*c^2]/[sq. root of (1- velocity^2/c^2)]
----I converted 2.555MeV (total energy) to 4.088e-13 J and plugged that in for E(total) to solve for velocity

The Attempt at a Solution



I used the EQN above to solve for velocity of the electron [in terms of c(speed of light)].
I then divided the total energy (2.555MeV) by this velocity

I don't believe that is correct; if you look at the equation you are using I think you'll find that you don't divide the energy by velocity to get momentum. What do you get?
 
I thought I solved for momentum because I found the velocity by the EQN i gave and I know the mass of an electron, but the units weren't right. I didn't know how to convert kg*m/s to MeV/c. I had energy in MeV and found my velocity in terms of c, so I couldn't think of anything else to do, but divide them. I feel like I'm using the right EQN, but I'm not sure how to derive my answer
 
umwolv16 said:
I thought I solved for momentum because I found the velocity by the EQN i gave and I know the mass of an electron, but the units weren't right. I didn't know how to convert kg*m/s to MeV/c. I had energy in MeV and found my velocity in terms of c, so I couldn't think of anything else to do, but divide them. I feel like I'm using the right EQN, but I'm not sure how to derive my answer

I think what you are missing is the definition of the relativistic momentum:

momentum =(gamma) m v

Since you have already done the work to find v, you could actually just plug that in and solve it. However, to get the equation related to what you have already done, note that:

momentum = (gamma) m v
energy = (gamma) m c^2

putting these together gives:

(v / c) = p c / E

and since you already have E in MeV and v in terms of c, you can get momentum directly.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top