Confused About Identifying Strongest and Weakest Redox Agents?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ahhhh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry Redox
AI Thread Summary
To identify the strongest and weakest redox agents, refer to the standard potential table, where higher potential values indicate stronger oxidizing agents. For reducing agents, the opposite is true; lower potential values signify stronger reducing agents. In a galvanic cell example, zinc has a lower standard potential (-0.76V) compared to copper (0.34V), meaning zinc is oxidized while copper is reduced. The reactivity of the metals determines their tendency to exist as ions or solids. Understanding these potential values is crucial for determining the strength of redox agents.
ahhhh
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm working on redox tables and I'm really confused. I know how to write out the half reactions, but i don't understand how you tell which is the strongest oxidizing agent or the weakest. Same thing with reducing agents which is strongest or weakest? Help please...

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm working on redox tables and I'm really confused. I know how to write out the half reactions, but i don't understand how you tell which is the strongest oxidizing agent or the weakest. Same thing with reducing agents which is strongest or weakest? Help please...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Okay, take for instance, a standard Copper/Zinc Galvanic Cell. When you look at the Standard Potential table [which I presume is what you're wondering about], look at the value and see whether if it like to remain as the ion or the solid [which what Redox is]. The more reactive metal, will like to become the ion, and in the case of the Copper/Zinc -

Zn2+ + 2e- \rightarrow Zn (-0.76V)

Cu2+ + 2e- \rightarrow Cu(0.34V)

Zinc likes to give off it's electrons to become the ion, hence the reverse voltage. So, simplified, just look at the Standard Potential if it is LOWER, so here, Zinc is being oxidized and Copper is being reduced. Hope that helped.
 
(Two threads merged)
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top