How does the space station survive the damages caused by debris in space?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on how the International Space Station (ISS) and satellites withstand damage from space debris. The vastness of space reduces the likelihood of collisions, as most debris travels in similar orbits and speeds. Small debris can cause significant damage, with even tiny paint flecks impacting at high velocities, leading to frequent window replacements on space shuttles. Despite the risks, the presence of windows is maintained for crew observation, although alternatives like cameras are suggested. Overall, effective debris management and protective measures are crucial for the safety of space missions.
wllsrvive
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
How does the space station, its solar panels and the satellites in space survive the potential damages caused by the different size of debris in space?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
For small stuff - it's made of metal
For larger stuff - it wouldn't

Space is rather large, so the chance of you and a bit of space debris being in the same place at the same time is rather small.
This is helped by the fact that most stuff is going in roughly the same direction, east-west near the equator, at the same speed.
And at the low orbits of the ISS and the space shuttle small things don't stay in orbit very long without being deliberately boosted.
 
Micrometeoroid and Orbital Debris (MMOD) Protection
http://www.nasa.gov/externalflash/ISSRG/pdfs/mmod.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Even a fleck of paint in the wrong place can cause damage.

http://www.aero.org/capabilities/cords/debris-risks.html"

NASA frequently replaces space shuttle orbiter windows because they are significantly damaged by objects as small as a flake of paint.

http://www.aero.org/capabilities/cords/images/window_000.gif
This 4-mm-diameter crater on the windshield of the space shuttle orbiter (see image above) was made by a small bit of space debris determined to be a fleck of white paint approximately 0.2 mm in diameter. It was traveling at a relative velocity of 3-6 km/sec when it impacted.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well that's silly, why are they still using windows? LOL
 
Freshtictac said:
Well that's silly, why are they still using windows? LOL
What would be the point of having a crew if they couldn't look out at the view?
 
mgb_phys said:
What would be the point of having a crew if they couldn't look out at the view?

Yeah, that's what camera's are for... maybe an observation vehicle that has shades?

It's not like people aren't used to life through a box anyway.
 
Back
Top