What is the Angle of Incline on a Frictionless Air Track?

  • Thread starter Thread starter idlackage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Incline
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the angle of incline on a frictionless air track, with an acceleration of 0.147 m/s². The correct answer is stated to be 4.10°. Participants analyze the forces acting on two masses, correcting equations related to tension and gravitational force components. Errors in initial calculations are identified, leading to revised equations and results, including a final angle calculation of approximately 3.57° and a mention of a close value of 4.09° based on a different method. The conversation emphasizes the importance of consistent directionality in force diagrams and accurate calculations.
idlackage
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Determine the angle of incline on https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=30517&stc=1&d=1291856979" frictionless air track.

Acceleration = 0.147 m/s2.

The answer is supposed to be 4.10°.

Homework Equations



Fnet = ma

The Attempt at a Solution



Mass 1 (https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=30515&stc=1&d=1291856979"):

Perpendicular (y):

Fny = +Fn
Ty = 0
ay = 0
Fgy = -m1gcosθ
= (428)(-9.80)cosθ
= -4194.4cosθ
Fn + Fgy = 0
Fn = +4194.4cosθ

Parallel (x):

Fnx = 0
= -m1gxsinθ
= -4194.4sinθ
Fnet = m1a
Fn + Fgx + T = m1a

+4194.4cosθ – (-4194.4sinθ) + T
= (428)(0.147)
= 62.9

Mass 2 (https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=30516&stc=1&d=1291856979"):

Fg2 = (20.0)(9.80)
= 196
Fg2 + T = m2a

196 + T = (20.0)(0.147)
= 2.94
T = 2.94 – 196
T = -490

Final calculations:

+4194.4cosθ – (-4194.4sinθ) + T = 62.9
(-) T = -490
----------------
+4194.4cosθ – (-4194.4sinθ) = 552

Not only do I not know how to solve that final equation, I'm also sure the answer will be wrong. I really don't get how to properly go about this question.
 

Attachments

  • fbd3_m1.jpg
    fbd3_m1.jpg
    3.2 KB · Views: 672
  • fbd3_m2.jpg
    fbd3_m2.jpg
    786 bytes · Views: 731
  • diagram3.jpg
    diagram3.jpg
    14.9 KB · Views: 726
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
idlackage said:
Parallel (x):

Fnx = 0
= -m1gxsinθ
= -4194.4sinθ
Fnet = m1a
Fn + Fgx + T = m1a
Stop!. This equation is wrong. The normal force is along y (as you correctly point out) and does not belong in the x-equation. Furthermore, the tension is up the incline and the component of the weight is down the incline, so they must have opposite signs.
 
kuruman said:
Stop!. This equation is wrong. The normal force is along y (as you correctly point out) and does not belong in the x-equation. Furthermore, the tension is up the incline and the component of the weight is down the incline, so they must have opposite signs.

Thank you! I omitted Fn and changed the equation to this:

Code:
-Fgx + T = -m1a
-4194.4sinθ + T
   = (428)(-0.147)
   = -62.9

So that the final calculations were:

Code:
    T = -62.9 + 4194.4sinθ
(-) T = -490
---------------------------
    0 = 427.1 + 4194.4sinθ
-427.1 = 4194.4sinθ
-427.1/sinθ = 4194.4
sinθ = -427.1/4194.4
   θ = sin-1(-427.1/4194.4)
   θ = 5.84°

Is this just a big percentage error, or am I still doing something wrong?
 
The equation from the second FBD is also incorrect. The weight and the tension are in opposite directions. When you fix it, make sure that the direction of the acceleration is consistent between FBD1 and FBD2.
 
I just realized I had no idea how I got 2.94 – 196 = -490 or other glaring errors. Is this correct?:

Code:
Fg2 - T = -m2a

196 - T = (20.0)(-0.147)
        = -2.94
-T = -2.94 – 196
T = 198.94

Final calculations:

    T = -62.9 + 4194.4sinθ
(-) T = 198.94
---------------------------
    0 = -260.94 + 4194.4sinθ
260.94 = 4194.4sinθ
260.94/sinθ = 4194.4
sinθ = 260.94/4194.4
    θ = sin-1(260.94/4194.4)
    θ = 3.57°
 
That looks about right considering round offs. I got 3.55o.

*** On edit ***
Note that according to your drawing, arcsin(0.162/2.28) = 4.09o. If that's not close enough, you may have to explain the discrepancy.
 
Awesome, thank you so much!
 
Back
Top