Off-axis magnetic field due to a current loop in cartesian coordinates

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around transforming the magnetic field expressions of a current loop from cylindrical to Cartesian coordinates, particularly involving elliptic integrals. The original poster seeks guidance on whether to derive the entire expression anew in Cartesian coordinates or if a transformation from cylindrical coordinates is feasible. A suggestion is made to express the field in spherical coordinates and utilize spherical harmonic theorems for rotation and translation. The poster finds a paper that presents both spherical and Cartesian expressions but is unsure of the derivation process from spherical to Cartesian. The conversation highlights the complexities of coordinate transformations in electromagnetic theory.
johnpatitucci
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi there,


a few days ago I derived the probably well-know expression for the magnetic field of a current loop including elliptic integrals of the first and second kind (it can be seen here http://plasmalab.pbworks.com/f/bfield.pdf" ). As I'd like to rotate and shift the position of the current loop I tried to transform the expressions for the fields B_r, B_z into cartesian coordinates but failed because i also need to transform the elliptic integrals and I don't know how to do that.

Do you think I have to derive the whole thing again (starting with the current density's in x-,y- and z-direction but now strictly in cartesian coordinates which is very tedious) or is there a way to get the wanted cartesian expression from the one's in cylindrcal coordinates which I have already written down.

Thanks for your comments !
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would instead express the field in spherical coordinates (see Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics, or everywhere on the web). Then use the spherical harmonic addition theorem for rotations, and spherical harmonic translation theorem for translations, to position your loop.

You can find these theorems in Steinborn and Ruedenberg, Rotation and Translation of...Spherical Harmonics, Advances in Quantum Chemistry, v. 7 (1979), and certainly elsewhere.
 
Thanks @marcusl. That is a pretty good idea and I going to try it now.


Yesterday, I found a paper (you can see it here: http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20010038494_2001057024.pdf" ) where the current loop expressions are written down in spherical as well as cartesian coordinates. On the first page the authors claim to have derived the cartesian result from the spherical expression but I don't know how. Anybody got a clue how one could do that ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top