Understanding Atom-Photon Interaction: How Long Will an Electron Hold Energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter QuarkCharmer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms Photons
QuarkCharmer
Messages
1,049
Reaction score
3
I am told that when an atom absorbs a photon, it jumps up an energy level, these are discrete levels of energy etc etc. What determines how long the electron will hold this energy, and what exactly is the photon (wave) doing to up it's energy level. For ease of explanation, let's assume Neon (1s^2 2s^2 2p^6) takes in a photon particle/wave. Is it now at the third energy level? How does this effect it's electron configuration?

I'm having a difficult time finding the answer to this question. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you might google 'selection rules'
 
QuarkCharmer said:
let's assume Neon (1s^2 2s^2 2p^6) takes in a photon particle/wave. Is it now at the third energy level?

It depends on the energy of the photon. In order for the atom to absorb the photon, the photon's energy has to match one of the possible upward transitions. It might kick an electron from n=2 to n=3 or from n=2 to n=4 or from n=1 to n=3, etc. Or it might do nothing at all because its energy doesn't match any transition.
 
QuarkCharmer said:
I am told that when an atom absorbs a photon, it jumps up an energy level, these are discrete levels of energy etc etc. What determines how long the electron will hold this energy, and what exactly is the photon (wave) doing to up it's energy level. For ease of explanation, let's assume Neon (1s^2 2s^2 2p^6) takes in a photon particle/wave. Is it now at the third energy level? How does this effect it's electron configuration?

I'm having a difficult time finding the answer to this question. Thanks

The excitation lifetime of an isolated molecule is one thing:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluorescence#Lifetime
and can depend on the number and type of states that it's allowed to relax to,
but it can also become de-excited by other non-radiative processes.

As to your other question, I have no direct experience with quantized light fields, so this may be an oversimplified idea, but in terms of what the photon is "doing", you can think of any excited state wave function as describing a atom/molecule + photon system, and what it's "doing" is making up the difference between the ground and excited states. I guess that doesn't really explain "what it's doing" but just "how to think about it". Hope that was at all helpful.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top