Wave Length of Photon: How Many Wavelengths Does It Contain?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ValenceE
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photon Wavelenght
ValenceE
Messages
142
Reaction score
0
Bob_for_short said:
The photon frequency is the wave frequency, no problem with it. A single photon is a sufficiently long wave packet (of thousands or dozens thousands of vibrations in it)...


Hello all,

The above quote is the first part of a reponse to a 2005 OP's question about frequency of a photon, and one of the few hints to an answer to one of my own enquiries about the wavelenght of a photon...

I understand that EM waves come in a vast number of frequencies, however I was wondering about the discreteness of the photon as an EM wave packet and namely the number of wavelengths it contains.

Are all photons alike in their composition, do they all have the same amount of wavelengths or is this dependant on some QM property ? if different, what determines the compositions of different wave packets ?


regards,

VE
 
Physics news on Phys.org
VE, Unfortunately Bob_for_short had it wrong.

Classically an electromagnetic wave comes in the form of a wave packet with a spread of frequencies ω ± δω. The frequency spread and the length of the packet are inversely related. One with a sharply defined frequency will have a very long wave packet, and one with a larger spread in frequency will have a short packet. Roughly the number of oscillations in the packet is given by the ratio ω/δω.

For a photon there is no difference. A photon will have some spread in energy, E ± δE. A photon with a sharply defined energy will have a long wave packet and one with a larger spread in energy will have a short one. Roughly the number of oscillations in the packet is given by E/δE.

Whether a classical description or a quantum description of the wave is appropriate depends only on the amplitude. Otherwise they are similar. The question you ask, "how many wavelengths does a photon contain" does not have a unique answer, because the answer depends on the energy spread.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top