Qausi-static displacement current (Purcell)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on Purcell's explanation of "quasi-static" displacement current and its effect on magnetic fields in slowly varying fields. It highlights that the curl of the displacement current, represented as curlJd, is nearly zero, leading to the conclusion that there is no magnetic field generated in such conditions. The confusion arises regarding how curlJd=0 directly implies that the magnetic field B is also zero. Participants are encouraged to clarify this relationship and whether the topic fits better in classical physics discussions. Understanding this concept is crucial for grasping the implications of displacement current in electromagnetic theory.
shooba
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
"Qausi-static" displacement current (Purcell)

Hello all,
On page 329, chapter 9 of Purcell's E&M book, he describes why the "displacement current" produces nearly zero magnetic field for slowly varying fields. By taking the curl of the displacement current Jd, he shows that curlJd=-(1/4\pic)(∂2B/∂t2), so that for slowly varying fields, curlJd is nearly zero. From this, using a symmetry/superposition argument he concludes that there can be no magnetic field for such a current distribution. It is this last step that I do not understand; how does curlJd=0 imply B=0?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Bump? Maybe this belongs in the classical physics section?
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top