Amperes circuital law for finite length of wire

AI Thread Summary
Ampere's circuital law yields the same magnetic field for a finite length of wire as for an infinite wire due to the nature of magnetic field integration. The Biot-Savart law indicates that the magnetic field around a finite wire is not constant, which complicates the application of Ampere's law. The discussion highlights that Ampere's law is derived under the assumption of a closed circuit, which is not satisfied for finite wires. Consequently, the divergence of the current density does not equal zero for finite wires, leading to the conclusion that Ampere's law is inapplicable in this context. This distinction is crucial for understanding the limitations of applying Ampere's law to finite wire scenarios.
jd12345
Messages
251
Reaction score
2
Why is that amperes circuital law gives the same magnetic field around a finite legnth of wrie as if it is an infintie legnth of wire?
By biot-savarts law we know that for a finite length of wire magnetic field is
μ i ( cos θ1 - cos θ2)/ 2∏r

I searched this question in google and one of the answer was that magnetic field will not be tangential to the circular loop we imagine around the wire. So when we integrate magnetic field cannot be calculated

But that's wrong isn't it? By biot-savarts law we see that magnetic field is tangential around the wire along the circular loop with the constatn value as given above. So we can integrate it and find the magnetic field using amperes law
But answer does not come. Why?

Sorry if it ahs been asked again. Give me the link if it has been. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK - here's the link.
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=166197
... also see the link in that thread.

I searched this question in google and one of the answer was
... best to provide the link to the references you use.
But answer does not come. Why?
... have you tried to do the calculation?
 
Yeah in your link - the reason because amperes circuital law doesn't work is as in the integral B.dl B is not constant so we cannot take out B out of the integral and find its value.
This isn't correct! Clearly B is constant around a finite length of wire having its value as
μ i ( cos θ1 - cos θ2)/ 2∏r
 
OK - so do it then.
 
Ampere's law is derived in magnetostatics from curl H =j (omitting constants),
which is derived from the B-S law by requiring div j=0 everywhere. You can see this by taking div of curl H=j. Div j does not equal zero for a finite wire, so Ampere's law does not apply. Ampere's law applies only for a closed circuit. For an infinite wire, the circuit can by closed by a semicircle of radius R which gives no contribution as R-->infinity.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top