Maxwell's, integrals, current, elements, delta phi and confusion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around confusion regarding concepts in an online EECS course, specifically about current, voltage, and Kirchhoff's laws. The term "elements" refers to circuit components like resistors, capacitors, and inductors, rather than periodic elements. The equation δφB/δt = 0 indicates that the magnetic flux density (B) is constant over time (t), which is crucial for Kirchhoff's voltage law to hold true. The integral notation discussed includes path integrals, where the circle denotes a closed path, and the difference between standard and path integrals is clarified. Understanding these concepts is essential for grasping the mathematical framework of electrical engineering.
OJFord
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I'm working on an online EECS course, and to be frank some of it is going straight over my head - but at the same time parts of it are far below my current knowledge, so I want to work and stick with it.


The speaker is working through proving current and voltage - to arrive at Kirchoff's laws as far as I can tell (though I haven't got that far).


The first thing that threw me was this talk of 'elements' - does he mean elements as in periodic? Or as in a sub-class of something, a circuit, anything?

He says that a basic rule is defined such that all elements must obey:

\frac{\delta\phi B}{\delta t} = 0

Otherwise they are not allowed, and by doing this it means that the mathematics works out okay, and we can calculate properties easily.

But what does it mean for del phi B by del t to equal 0? What are B and t?


Are they properties of materials that make - say, silicon - suitable for use in electronic circuits?



My second question regards integrating notation. I haven't come across integrals with the following notation yet, and I hope someone can explain:

1) \oint

(ie, what's the difference with the addition of the circle/loop in the center?)

2) \int_{ab} or \int_{\delta c}

(ie, what does it mean to only have a lower limit? Or is the first the lower and second the upper, and in the case of delta c, the limits are the difference represented by the delta - ie if it were say dl, showing extension, the lower limit would be original and the upper the extended length?)

3) \int\int or \oint\oint

(I assume these are for 'second integrals', much like d^2y/dx^2?)



Thanks in advance for any help on either question.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
OJFord said:
I'm working on an online EECS course, and to be frank some of it is going straight over my head - but at the same time parts of it are far below my current knowledge, so I want to work and stick with it.The speaker is working through proving current and voltage - to arrive at Kirchoff's laws as far as I can tell (though I haven't got that far).The first thing that threw me was this talk of 'elements' - does he mean elements as in periodic? Or as in a sub-class of something, a circuit, anything?

He says that a basic rule is defined such that all elements must obey:

\frac{\delta\phi B}{\delta t} = 0

Otherwise they are not allowed, and by doing this it means that the mathematics works out okay, and we can calculate properties easily.

But what does it mean for del phi B by del t to equal 0? What are B and t?Are they properties of materials that make - say, silicon - suitable for use in electronic circuits?
My second question regards integrating notation. I haven't come across integrals with the following notation yet, and I hope someone can explain:

1) \oint

(ie, what's the difference with the addition of the circle/loop in the center?)

2) \int_{ab} or \int_{\delta c}

(ie, what does it mean to only have a lower limit? Or is the first the lower and second the upper, and in the case of delta c, the limits are the difference represented by the delta - ie if it were say dl, showing extension, the lower limit would be original and the upper the extended length?)

3) \int\int or \oint\oint

(I assume these are for 'second integrals', much like d^2y/dx^2?)
Thanks in advance for any help on either question.

1.) He probably means circuit elements when he says 'elements'...like resistors, inductors, and capacitors.

2.) In dB/dt = 0, B is the magnetic flux density and t is time. This means that the magnetic flux density is constant wrt time. This is needs to be true for kirchhoffs voltage law to be true, otherwise you get non conservative electric fields invalidating KVL.

3.) The integral symbol with the circle denotes a path integral around a closed loop.

4.) The integral symbol with ab at the bottom denotes a path integral from points a to b.

5.) the double integrall symbols are for when integrating a surface and the triple integrals are for wen integrating a volume.

-Matt Leright
 
Thanks for your response.

2) So is that a material or component property? ie. by material I mean is that why silicon is used, or by component I mean would it be a consideration if I were a company manufacturing resistors?

3) Is a path integral the same as a line integral? And what's the difference between this and a 'standard' integral that I'm used to seeing?

4) Even without the loop in the middle? I would ask more about this but I feel the answer is probably obvious to me when I understand the answer to my question 3).
Thanks again.
 
OJFord said:
Thanks for your response.

2) So is that a material or component property? ie. by material I mean is that why silicon is used, or by component I mean would it be a consideration if I were a company manufacturing resistors?
No, it is just stating that there is no varying magnetic field.
3) Is a path integral the same as a line integral? And what's the difference between this and a 'standard' integral that I'm used to seeing?
Yes, but the integral sign with a circle means that the path is a closed path...like a circle where the end of the path is the beginning of the path.
4) Even without the loop in the middle? I would ask more about this but I feel the answer is probably obvious to me when I understand the answer to my question 3).



Thanks again.

Say if you have a line integral: \int_{ab} implies you integrate from point a to point b. But if point b is equal to point a, then you have a closed path. Then instead, you put a circle on the integral.
 
the circle can also indicate an integral on a closed surface...like a sphere,
 
You are right,

Usually books use \oint_c \; for line integral for closed path. \oint_s \; is for closed surface.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top