How did they measure the charge of electron

Boody
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I know that a charge is discribed in terms of coulombs. But how did they know that an electron has a charge of 1.60217646 × 10-19 coulomb ? by the way , what is a coulomb exactly ? and how did they found or discribed its quantity ? I would like the answer to be in details please . Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look up the Millikan oil drop experiment.

A coulomb is exactly that amount of charge which results from a current of one Ampere flowing for one second.
 
you said it is " the amount of charge which results from a current of one Ampere flowing for one second " ,, what is Ampere ? and how would we find it ? ( suppose we want to calculate the charge and the magnitude of the charge is not given)
 
Welcome to PF!

Hi Boody! Welcome to PF! :smile:
Boody said:
… what is Ampere ? and how would we find it ?

The ampere (small "a" :wink:) is defined in terms of ordinary mechanical units.

From the PF Library

the amp is that current which in a pair of wires a metre apart would produce a force between them of 2 10-7 N/m​
 


mmmm, I see

Thanks :)
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top