Determine the length of the curve sin(x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve Length
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the length of the sine curve from x=0 to 2π, which involves the integral ∫ from 0 to 2π of √(1 + cos²(x)) dx. This integral is identified as a form of an elliptical integral, which cannot be expressed in terms of elementary functions. The numerical value can be approximated using methods like Simpson's rule or numerical integration techniques. The conversation highlights that this problem is similar in complexity to finding the area under a curve, emphasizing the need for approximations in both cases. Ultimately, the length of the sine curve is expressed as 4√2E(1/2), where E(x) represents the complete elliptical integral of the second kind.
Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
What is the measure of the sin(x) wave for x=0 to 2∏?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's \int^{2\pi}_0\sqrt{\cos(x)^2+1} dx
 
That's what I got. Would one need a table of integrals to determine its numerical value?
 
Pretty straight forward, isn't it? Considering the other problems you have posted on here, you should be able to do this.

The length of the graph of y= f(x), from x= a to x= b, is given by
\int_{x=a}^b \sqrt{1+ f'(x)^2}dx
With y= f(x)= sin(x), f'(x)= cos(x) so that becomes
\int_{x=0}^{2\pi} \sqrt{1+ cos^2(x)}dx
However, that looks to me like a version of an elliptical integral which cannot be done in terms of elementary functions.

Hey, no fair posting while I'm typing!
 
HallsofIvy said:
However, that looks to me like a version of an elliptical integral which cannot be done in terms of elementary functions.
Yep. It's 4√2E(1/2), where E(x) is the complete elliptical integral of the second kind.
 
to get a numerical value try numerical integration, simpson's rule? etc...

this is no worse than finding the area under the curve from 0 to 1. i.e. both are approximations.(nobody knows what cos(1) is.)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top