Orbits for classical mechanics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the orbits of a mass under the force function F(r) = -A/r^2 + B/r^3, where A is positive and B can be either positive or negative. Participants are encouraged to attempt a solution and refer to classical mechanics literature, specifically chapter 8 of Thornton and Marion's "Classical Dynamics," for guidance on central force motion. Emphasis is placed on making an effort to solve the problem independently before seeking help. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the theoretical background to approach the problem effectively. Engaging with the recommended resources is crucial for grasping the concepts involved.
madwolf
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Find the orbits for the m mass under the F(r)=-A/r^2+B/r^3 . Where A>0 and B is positive or negative.
Friends, please help me for homework
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is necessary for you to make some attempt at a solution. If you have not already done so, read a chapter in a classical mechanics book on central force motion. For example chp 8 in thornton and marion Classical Dynamics. The steps for solving such a problem will be outlined for you there.
 
AlexChandler said:
It is necessary for you to make some attempt at a solution. If you have not already done so, read a chapter in a classical mechanics book on central force motion. For example chp 8 in thornton and marion Classical Dynamics. The steps for solving such a problem will be outlined for you there.

thank you very much
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top