What is the optimal torque angle for hardened head studs in a vehicle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DieselDave
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engine Head
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the optimal torque angle for hardened head studs in vehicles, emphasizing the importance of yield strength over hardness. The original poster seeks to understand if the new hardened studs can be torqued to a higher angle than the stock ones, which are set at 220°. It is suggested that loading the studs to 95% of their yield strength is ideal for reusability, and using the angle of turn method can allow for scaling based on the yield strengths of the old and new studs. Additionally, the integrity of the female threads is highlighted, with recommendations to ensure adequate thread engagement to prevent damage. Overall, careful consideration of material properties and thread engagement is crucial for optimal performance.
DieselDave
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, can't believe I haven't discovered this forum until now - I would post in an introductions section, however I couldn't find one!

This question is loosely based around mechanical engineering, however may be applied to automotive, so apologies for posting in the wrong section.

I have had a set of hardened head studs made for my vehicle (for upgraded power/boost etc), the stock ones are grade 10.9, and the never ones should *in theory* be above 12.9 grade, by the by, they are stronger due to them being hardened.

My understanding is that in this situation, the newer hardened studs should stretch the same amount as the old studs under the same amount of loads, however due to their hardness and bearing hookes law in mind, they should purely be able to stretch further without yielding?, am I correct in my assumption?. Therefore would be able to be torqued to a higher torque angle than the stock bolts, applying a greater force on its respective load.

Stock torque angle is 220°, and with the newer bolts then a greater torque angle should be able to be acheived, without damage and yield of the bolts (assuming same conditions, bolt pitch, friction etc)

Or am I totally barking up the wrong tree here, and due to them being heat treated and hardened, this would reduce the malleability, therefore increasing the load on the bolts before yield point, although lower the malleability and ability for them to stretch as much before the yield point? so a higher clamping force will be achieved with less of a torque angle?

Any help on this subject would be greatly appreciated, here's and a photo of the new products.

IMAG0077.jpg


Many thanks, dave
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Don't care how hard they are. Care about their yield strength. Once you look that up, the ideal is to load them to 95% of yield if you want them to be reusable. Some engineering applications call for them to go past yield, but then they are one time use only.

If you use a torque wrench, then you must settle for a load much less than yield because of the great uncertainty in converting torque to load.

But if you are using the angle of turn method, then you can at least scale that up by the ratio of yield strengths of the old and new studs. If you learn the math required for the task, you may be able to go well beyond that.

All your assumptions based on Hook's Law are valid.
 
It is a good thing that your studs are so long. That increases your joint stiffness ratio, which does all sorts of good things for you. One of your best references is Machinery's Handbook. You should be able to look up everything you need in that.
 
Before just wanging up the torque, I'd have a look at the relative strengths of the threads.
By just upping the bolt strength, you can get to a point where you start winding out the female thread.

It's unlikely but something to bear in mind.
 
As Chris says, need to check but the female threads are probably good. The standard fix would be a helicoil, which would be much stronger. Look to see how much thread engagement you have. If it is at least 2D, I would not worry about it. It is always best if the female threads are cut into softer material so that they will yield and then more threads carry the load.
 
Last edited:
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Calculate minimum RPM to self-balance a CMG on two legs'
Here is a photo of a rough drawing of my apparatus that I have built many times and works. I would like to have a formula to give me the RPM necessary for the gyroscope to balance itself on the two legs (screws). I asked Claude to give me a formula and it gave me the following: Let me calculate the required RPM foreffective stabilization. I'll use the principles of gyroscopicprecession and the moment of inertia. First, let's calculate the keyparameters: 1. Moment of inertia of...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
Back
Top