Dynamics of axially loaded bar

  • Thread starter Thread starter svishal03
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the derivation of the consistent mass matrix for an axially loaded bar, specifically questioning the assumptions made in equation 10.51 regarding forces on a differential element. The author, David Hutton, assumes an initial axial loading condition that results in a non-zero net force on the differential elements, which can occur even without external loads between the ends. An example provided is the impact of a hammer on the bar, illustrating how stress waves propagate through the material. The analysis applies Newton's second law to the small element, emphasizing the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurate finite element analysis of axially loaded bars.
svishal03
Messages
124
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I have a simple question and shall be grateful if helped.

See the attached word document.I have been reading the derivation of the consistent mass matrix- for the axially loaded bar.My question is:

1)While formng the equation 10.51 (referring figure 10.7), the author considers the equilibrium of the differential element of length dx.

But the forces on each end ofthe differential element can be different only if there is some load between the two ends.

IS this some kind of error that the author David Hutton of the concerned text on Fundamentals of Finite Element analysis has not considered the force(s) between the ends?

Please help.

Vishal
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
The author is assuming some axial loading initial condition. It is this loading that causes the non-zero net force on the differential elements. A common example would be striking the end of the bar with a hammer. The speed with which the stress wave propagates down the rod is determined using the one dimensional wave equation (10.52) and equals \sqrt{E/ρ}.
 
The bar can move. The equation is just Newton's second law applied to the small element. Force = mass times acceleration.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top