Can Matter Exist as a Gas at Zero Kelvin?

AI Thread Summary
Matter cannot exist as a gas at absolute zero (0 K) due to the principles of thermodynamics. At this temperature, the specific heat of materials approaches zero, leading gases at finite pressure to condense into other phases, such as solids or superfluids, rather than remaining gaseous. The third law of thermodynamics supports this, indicating that real systems reach thermal equilibrium at temperatures above absolute zero. Additionally, quantum effects become significant near absolute zero, resulting in unusual behaviors that defy traditional phase definitions. Therefore, the concept of a gas at 0 K is more theoretical than practical.
Sunfire
Messages
221
Reaction score
4
Hello All,

Can matter exist in a gaseous form at zero K? I am asking because common gasses (e.g. air) would liquify at cryogenic temperatures...

Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just guessing: If the density was low enough and there was no force (like gravity) to make the molecules come together.
 
Sunfire said:
Hello All,

Can matter exist in a gaseous form at zero K? I am asking because common gasses (e.g. air) would liquify at cryogenic temperatures...

Many thanks
I don't think the phase of a system can be determined in the limit of zero pressure and zero absolute temperature.
I suspect that all materials would be gaseous in the limit of finite temperature, zero pressure and infinite time. If the atoms of a material are spaced far enough from other materials, the forces that hold them together would be effectively zero. So if there was absolutely nothing else in the universe except a solid piece of iron with finite mass, and if the absolute temperature was more than zero, then I think that that piece of iron would eventually sublimate into an iron gas. This is a zero pressure system which never reaches equilibrium. Real systems have a finite pressure and eventually reach thermal equilibrium.
Given a finite pressure, I think that all gases would condense to some other phase at zero absolute temperature. I say that because of the third law of thermodynamics (weak form). The third law of thermodynamics says that the specific heat of a material approaches zero in the limit of absolute temperature approaching zero.
Ideal gases have a finite specific heat proportional to the universal gas constant. This contradicts the third law of thermodynamics. Therefore, gases at finite pressure have to equilibrate at zero absolute temperature to some other phase.
Note that this phase does not have to be a solid. Helium at q atmosphere condenses to a superfluid at temperatures below 4 °K. Other materials equilibrate to Bose-Einstein condensates at millidegree absolute temperatures. However, these materials are not considered true gases. At least these states are very far from ideal gases.
There are some other discussion threads around here that involve the third law of thermodynamics. You may be interested in some of those threads.
Also note that near absolute zero temperature, the quantum nature of materials starts to become important. At millikelvin temperatures, atoms start to behave more like waves than particles. At very low temperatures, the wavelength of an atom can be bigger than the distance to other atoms. So materials act real weird at microKelvin temperatures. There are some very strange phases that are outside the paradigm of gas, liquid and solid.
If one are interested in very cold temperatures, then one should know a little about quantum mechanics and the third law of thermodynamics. I think that you may find the third law of thermodynamics particularly interesting.
 
I agree, the 0K is more of an asymptotic limit, rather than a temperature of a real material. Isn't there a principle of 0K being unreachable?

Than at least for the purposes of my current study, I need to look at the behavior of an (ideal) gas when T-->0. I need this expression for say c_p = f(T) @ T -->0
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top