Equating E=mc^2 & E=hf: A Derivation of de Broglie's Theorem

repugno
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
On a couple of webisites I have seen that they have equated E=mc^2 with E=hf ... i.e hf=mc^2

But how can this be done when E=hf is describing the energy of a photon and E=mc^2 isnt?

Also, can someone provide me with a derivation of de Broglie’s theorem ?

Wavelength = h/momentum
thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
repugno said:
On a couple of webisites I have seen that they have equated E=mc^2 with E=hf ... i.e hf=mc^2

I bet they're deriving the "relativistic mass" of a photon. I don't consider the concept of "relativistic mass" to be very useful in general, let alone for a photon. But some people seem to like the idea.

Of course, they might be doing something completely different, but you didn't provide any context, so it's hard to tell.

Also, can someone provide me with a derivation of de Broglie’s theorem ?

Wavelength = h/momentum

Start with the general relationship between energy, momentum and invariant mass (not "relativistic mass"):

E^2 = \sqrt {p^2 c^2 + m^2 c^4}

Set m = 0 and E = hf for a photon. Also for a photon you have good old c = f \lambda.
 


It is not entirely accurate to equate E=mc^2 with E=hf, as these equations represent different concepts. E=mc^2 is the famous mass-energy equivalence equation, which states that mass and energy are interchangeable and that a small amount of mass can be converted into a large amount of energy. On the other hand, E=hf represents the energy of a photon, where h is Planck's constant and f is the frequency of the photon. These equations cannot be directly equated because they describe different phenomena.

However, there is a connection between these two equations through the concept of mass-energy equivalence. According to de Broglie's theory, all particles, including photons, have a wave-like nature. This means that they can also be described by a wavelength, which is given by the equation λ = h/p, where p is the momentum of the particle. This equation is known as de Broglie's wavelength equation. If we substitute the value of momentum (p) in this equation with the equation p=mc, we get λ = h/mc. This is where the connection between E=mc^2 and E=hf can be seen. By rearranging this equation, we get E=hf=mc^2, which shows that the energy of a particle (represented by E) can be expressed in terms of its mass (m) and its frequency (f).

In summary, while E=mc^2 and E=hf are not equivalent equations, they are connected through the concept of mass-energy equivalence and de Broglie's theory of wave-particle duality.

As for a derivation of de Broglie's theorem, it is beyond the scope of this response. However, a simple Google search can provide you with various resources and explanations on how this equation was derived. I would also recommend consulting a textbook or seeking help from a physics tutor for a more in-depth understanding.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top